Skip to content

Mark District X as 'stolen'

RejectedDraft

Proposal Details

Author0x153b…364d
PublishedAug 01, 2023 15:35
Voting beginsAug 01, 2023 15:35
Voting endsAug 08, 2023 15:35
Snapshot#9de5924

Description

Recently, the community has engaged in an investigation over the handling of District X, and the current leadership of RobL#4045. This investigation has brought to light several issues: Rob became custodian of District X without contributor’s input; when the original custodians left, Rob took leadership custody, alongside Carl F via a centralized decision of original leadership who could not continue. The land is sitting in a wallet with multi-sig, controlled by an LLC that is owned entirely by Rob and a ‘partner’, no contributors were given a share despite original contributor agreement mentioning group purchase & ownership of land. Rob has removed all rights from contributors, stating that he owes them nothing, and that the land is his to control. Rob’s contribution to district X is believed to be 2 parcels out of 2,001 total (.099%) Rob has failed to deliver financial records of the Districts performance year over year as outlined in contributor agreements, despite public information that he is renting out the land for payment. Attempts to resolve this in the District X discord has led to Rob banning or muting original contributors from District X forums such as Discord and Twitter. Rob has conversed with multiple different interested parties to sell the entire district for personal gain (by transferring ownership of the LLC), for a large sum (~7 figures). Rob did not consult contributors and has stated they have no rights. When confronted - he states the assets are his and his partners to do as they please, including selling it in its entirety and keeping the money.

2 Comments

daoAug 08, 2023

Mark District X as 'stolen' This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 14% 1,085,003 VP (86 votes) * No 80% 5,786,940 VP (27 votes) * Abstain 6% 514,858 VP (13 votes)

3Point1FourAug 02, 2023

Wasn't this draft already rejected twice? What is the point in bringing this up again if there isn't any material development since the last vote? Voting NO since this draft was already previously rejected twice. https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=fc618fd0-f4df-11ed-9bc2-e5fe350d0c93 https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=486cf0e0-aa53-11ed-8dfe-4ff0ad4dfd32