Skip to content

Should the Revocation Committee have 5 total members instead of 7?

PassedGovernance

Proposal Details

Author0x895b…8fe5
PublishedFeb 29, 2024 08:03
Voting beginsFeb 29, 2024 08:03
Voting endsMar 14, 2024 08:03
Snapshot#4a15f91

Description

Since 2023-07-07, the Revocation Committee has had 6 cases. In that time we've gathered enough information and experience to agree on some changes to improve how the revocation process works, the full text of which we will publish in the near future. One of those ideas is to shrink the Revocation Committee from 7 total member slots (5 active members and 2 substitutes) to 5 total member slots (3 active members and 2 substitutes).

Voting Rationale

0x521B…8692Yes511,415

leave me the fuck alone with those stupid delays to cast votes...

0x3385…CFAFNo504

more people - less centralization

3 Comments

daoMar 14, 2024

Should the Revocation Committee have 5 total members instead of 7? This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 89% 7,908,017 VP (69 votes) * No 1% 7,172 VP (5 votes) * Abstain 10% 898,944 VP (7 votes)

DedHeadJFeb 29, 2024

Revocations managed with only 4 so 5 is a great option.

web3nitFeb 29, 2024

Not sure if its the best option. Having 7 members in a team can increase conflict resolution efficiency, diversify viewpoints, and increase transparency.