Reverse akasya hahaha

Top Performing Scenes Reward Program This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 20% 2,000,865 VP (25 votes) * No 63% 6,002,130 VP (54 votes) * Abstain 17% 1,661,935 VP (18 votes)

[quote="Canessa, post:3, topic:20193"] Does this mean that venues like DG’s poker areas will be eligible for this? We could just hand them first prize for every month [/quote] No, don't worry, scenes with loads of bots will get the first places. The bots activity is already increasing in DCL and this proposal would only accentuate the issue. But a bot is a DAU is guess :man_shrugging: [quote="dao, post:1, topic:20193"] Transparency and Data: All the information utilized in the Rewards Program is already public and available in our catalysts. [/quote] Where can we find this data? I do not believe the Foundation data is available "in the catalysts". Atlas collects data from the catalysts but that's it An IP costs ~2 USD per month, we can get away with less when using a VPN with many exit points. If I create 8k fake accounts (4 per IP, 1000 IPs), that's would cost me at worst 2000 USD, I can then have them roam across 3 or 4 different scenes (automatically) and grab at minimum 2700 USD (lowest prize) * 3

I kinda don't get why there are not at least 3M VP voting yes on this tbh. What has changed compared to the poll? Yeah, it might result in DG getting 3 consecutive 1sts and the same scenes being rewarded in general in the beginning. But if done right, this can and will for sure incentivize ppl to be active and to promote what they are doing in dcl, which should lead to more interest and (friendly) competition. I still think this is a great idea and at least worth experimenting with. If it works: great! If it doesn't: let's try something else...

Love this idea but feel like the top ranked scenes might also have other DAO grants fueling their development. Is there any thought to limiting the scenes included in the rewards pool only to those not already receiving funds via other DAO grants?

if the criteria is just to stay in a spot in a certain amount of time or sign something manually then it would be too easy for our countrymen to swarm this hahaha expect a record to be broken haha

I could be the odd one out here as I hold a differing viewpoint, but I find merit in this proposal. It fosters a proactive approach among scene/land owners to actively promote their respective scenes/projects, while concurrently striving to attract greater footfall and engagement. I discern no issue in the scenario where Decentral Games consistently emerges victorious, given their demonstrable capacity to draw substantial attendance, including new participants. Consequently, it is apt that they receive commensurate recognition in the event that this proposal is ratified. I fail to detect any semblance of begrudging intent aimed at obstructing or precluding Decentral Games from attaining the reward. It is prudent to cultivate a mindset shift wherein proactive analysis is undertaken, and endeavors are directed towards elevating other domains across all facets, encompassing marketing, promotion, amplification, and social engagement. This approach aims to cultivate a competitive spirit and seeks to challenge the prevailing norms, rather than succumbing to the acceptance of Decentral Games' supremacy or the dominance of well-established endeavors already commanding significant patronage. Notably, the competition extends beyond a solitary prize. Given the profusion of endeavors professing their commitment to user onboarding, the proposed incentive provides an added impetus, fostering an environment that encourages the onboarding of a larger user/player base. Alternatively, I inquire whether apprehension towards competition is the underlying motivation. In other words, are we so afraid of the competition that would allow us to challenge and better ourselves? Wouldn't it be wiser to utilize this grant to uplift current deployments and project owners, distributing benefits based on merit? Or do we prefer allocating a substantial amount to a single project, which offers no assured influx of new users beyond mere claims.

Question remains unanswered after 3 days, voting no for now.

It looks like the DAO preferred to fund a grant request of $32k + per community rather than $90k for all communities hahaha. what a shame hahaha The DAO can save budget and at the same time grows DCL's user base. I wonder how many people can be onboarded with $90k competition. I wonder if DG can maintain its number 1 spot hahaha. Just an opinion though. Feel free to cancel or invalidate me. Cheers hahaha akasya.eth

Does this mean that venues like DG's poker areas will be eligible for this? We could just hand them first prize for every month, because they are a different model than all other venues on the map and are always #1. How would you prevent this or make it equitable?

Let's try in the first three months :smiley: and see if we can sustain this business model. If this will be passed, it's okay to deploy capital on my side hahaha. What do you think @zCayel @ITSUCKSTOBEME ? * If it succeeds in the first three months, we can continue it and adjust the rewards or the criteria depending on the result. * If it fails, at least we have tested whether any scene can handle 500~1,000 avatars in a single realm. It will be a win-win situation as long as the bot detection is strong enough to satisfy the professionals in the DAO. Cheers! akasya.eth