Skip to content

Ban the name DCLDAO

RejectedName Ban

Proposal Details

Author0xc375…f84a
PublishedNov 19, 2022 06:12
Voting beginsNov 19, 2022 06:12
Voting endsNov 26, 2022 06:12
Snapshot#94f5287

Description

Recently a member of the community started using the name DCLDAO and voting on proposals under this title. I believe this name should be banned as it can create confusion for community members who are unaware this is not an official DCL DAO account.

Voting Power

00.25M0.5MRequired to pass11/1911/2011/2211/2411/25
YesNo

90 Comments

UnknowerMar 04, 2023

We can't handhold the entire world though. The type of people to blindly accept a name at face value will probably be the type to fall prey to countless other phishing and social engineering schemes. Just natural selection at work.

noh0mieDec 04, 2022

I'd like to say in recap too I am happy with the outcome of this proposal, I think as a community we have reached a decent solution moving forward. But I would also like to point out in the comments of this post some members could do a bit better at using their words productively instead of name calling or labeling things as stupid. This should be a place for productive discussion, I understand people can feel emotional about issues in the DAO but we should all be open to hearing each others opinions even if they are ones we don't agree with.

noh0mieDec 04, 2022

Proposal is coming this week, will be circulating a draft and looking for co-authors if @szjanko or anyone else is interested.

ALPHAALVESNov 26, 2022

Thanksgiving is over.. you don't share the same views as us or you would have abstained from voting.. You followed your whale friends and now you are trying to say you don't want to ban anything? If new users want to distinguish official members in the foundation or committees... they can visit this site, https://governance.decentraland.org/transparency/ The DCL Foundation can make sure to stay on top of updating their members and if we would like to add the checkmark as well i will want to see a proposal for that so we can vote :clinking_glasses: ![image|690x295](upload://qT5MDyBqyzrUl4eiRmYoSoqXk6r.png) ![image|690x429](upload://utCZXfJ7uvvenCK1sFwqwMPbhmZ.png)

ALPHAALVESNov 26, 2022

YES !!! Completely agree with this comment! They should've minted the Founders' names in the whitepaper as well :slight_smile:

MetaTrekkersNov 26, 2022

Thank you so much for your great deed and understanding Hp!🙏🏿🙏🏿❤️

ArtReYouNov 26, 2022

Great Solution, looking forward for this. :pray: Thank you and have nice Weekend

HPrivakosNov 26, 2022

It will be used to create a World for DAO events and Town Halls.

nwizNov 26, 2022

[quote="kingmizomadeit, post:59, topic:16673"] we might as well keep censoring all the way [/quote] Hmm, interesting take…

ArtReYouNov 26, 2022

What you mean? You have 3 options: - Voting YES - Voting NO - No Voting Your decision was voting YES to ban the name. You could have waited and abstained. Action speaks louder than words. Have a great day

MetaTrekkersNov 26, 2022

Haha congrats! @nwiz

MetaTrekkersNov 26, 2022

I think in the future, we should just do a poll first instead of an actual proposal immediately. There is only a Yes or No option. We should have different options for different results. Anyway the proposal didn’t pass and the name was traded to someone in the foundation. So it seems like a win-win situation for everyone. Take care and have a great day.

ArtReYouNov 26, 2022

They made a nice OTC Deal.....Well done @nwiz ![Bildschirmfoto 2022-11-26 um 14.20.44|484x500](upload://hznHbl7fc5HPUMNrCYvhYnVoH8m.png)

nwizNov 26, 2022

[quote="MetaTrekkers, post:75, topic:16673"] I don’t want to ban anything [/quote] this is a contradiction to your vote, ser. 🙃

MetaTrekkersNov 26, 2022

Oh sorry, I guess what I mean is I like the “ Blue check mark idea you proposed. ”

mazafakaNov 26, 2022

![mtfinal|569x500](upload://xpZrSSwEZ6JsVpYXLmPit6hMxSe.png) nice timing, just sayin'

szjankoNov 26, 2022

We dont share the same views... I dont know why you are using my name here? You voted to ban the name on this proposal and I 100% disagree with that decision.

MetaTrekkersNov 26, 2022

Hi @nwiz, Happy Thanksgiving. We actually had this discussion after the town hall meeting two days ago. Interesting points were made. I share the same views as szjanko, no need to ban it but maybe make some official names with blue check marks etc. I don’t want to ban anything, just wants new comers to be able to distinguish the official employees of the committee from regular individuals when voting or they will be confused.

daoNov 26, 2022

Ban the name DCLDAO This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 42% 5,947,146 VP (38 votes) * No 58% 7,966,218 VP (84 votes)

nwizNov 25, 2022

[quote="MetaTrekkers, post:22, topic:16673"] yes it needs education and not the ban [/quote] @MetaTrekkers, has your position on this issue changed?

nwizNov 25, 2022

[quote="Doug-NFTWorld, post:5, topic:16673"] It is misrepresentation. [/quote] Banning Names that are completely valid is censorship.

ALPHAALVESNov 24, 2022

GM :heart: Happy Thanksgiving :turkey:

noh0mieNov 24, 2022

so I do think this does fall under 2.4 "content that is... misleading..." however my consensus is a verified mark would be the ideal solution. I will be submitting a proposal for this after the holidays if you would like to cosign it when its ready @nwiz or @szjanko

nwizNov 23, 2022

![Screenshot 2022-11-23 at 19.17.29|690x160](upload://do0sQbajvqwvvIBjDgfFQcWExk6.png) ![Screenshot 2022-11-23 at 19.22.12|686x500](upload://6Vk6lRy6YIkJomQlRAV1eYsZ9Qw.jpeg) https://drive.google.com/file/d/16R8JjoHastrJXyTW7pj0DQ4Vf4Tp-cEQ/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eyxcJuKf-e8f5Jm_lOKiB7YjM6ApnbFL/view

ArtReYouNov 23, 2022

He had the opportunity...but its too late now