Refund smart contract audit of DCLControllerV2 (NAME minting)
Proposal Details
Grant size
Tier
Beneficiary
Description
The audit is complete and can be [found here](https://github.com/decentraland/smart-contract-audits/blob/master/reports/DCLControllerV2_FacundoSpagnuolo_03_03_2023.pdf) along side [all other audit reports](https://github.com/decentraland/smart-contract-audits) of Decentraland smart contracts.
Refund smart contract audit of DCLControllerV2 (NAME minting) This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xbef99f5f55cf7cdb3a70998c57061b7e1386a9b0) https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1a97e9da7c0b62a9af546f82ecbe90adb9ab327ac91bee86884d89f25b2a469b
Refund smart contract audit of DCLControllerV2 (NAME minting) This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 91% 6,338,924 VP (97 votes) * No 8% 560,527 VP (12 votes) * Abstain 1% 6,831 VP (7 votes)
Hi, leo cositorto here. It's a yes from me. those 900 usd should be returned, it's ridiculous for the community to complain about this silly amount that provides a lot of value in security.
I agree with Jarod.. if we already specified that fees for smart contract auditing would be refunded to foundation in a previous proposal, this vote is unnecessary.
Smartcontracts require audits to ensure they are safe. Smartcontracts are owned by the DAO, therefore it make sense for the DAO to at least pay for audits. Development cost is handled by the Foundation.
So now we are setting the precedent that anything the DAO wants Foundation to integrate the DAO has to pay for it? Why couldn't we do that with the Hand category or a new Minting Tier?
then why does it need another vote?
It was communicated in the proposal to redirect name fee: [quote="dao, post:1, topic:17631"] A new DCLController smart contract will be created by the Foundation’s dApps team. The team will also look for audits quote and manage the process. Then, the DAO will refund the Foundation for the cost of the audits. [/quote]
I thought the foundation had a separate treasury and budgets for things like these? We can mix finances between Foundation and DAO but not communications.
9 Comments