Add Random Ravers to the Linked Wearables Registry This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 17% 270,652 VP (38 votes) * No 83% 1,276,569 VP (53 votes)

Like it.. i’m on random ravers from long time..

Hi Canessa, Thanks a lot for your feedback and your kindness it is much appreciated. I believe maybe our proposal was wrongly written and we haven't shown enough evidence of all the cool things we have already been working in decentraland since the beginning of the year and that we have skin in the game. I will create the name asap, so that we can have our GM Studios and Random Ravers handle secured. And will probably delete this proposal and upload a new one. Showing the Wearable that we want to link. We have already gone through the classical process of submitting wearables and paying the MANA fees to have our wearables in Decentraland, it is not a money issue in our end. However, the point is that we believe it's better to have 1 NFT that can be used in several metaverses vs having 2 or more NFTs in a wallet. Having 1 NFT makes the user experience better for our users. I also understand the 4M VP is a lot of votes. We will try to get them and if not we will go through the other process. Again, thanks a lot for your input :smiley: Best, Dante

Hi Dante, Thank you for taking the time to write this proposal. Linked wearables are relatively new, and it's challenging to get the support to pass a proposal. A few things that I feel the community looks for is: 1) Mint the name you are submitting the proposal with, or at least give your account a name. You have a eth address for your name. A minted NFT name costs about $70 right now, and that money is returned to the DAO. Some feel that it is the very basic move that you can make that shows you have "skin in the game" in Decentraland. 2) Linked wearables are a GREAT way to onboard NFT projects! We want these users coming into our space. Some projects include multiple pieces to showcase how far they can push the boundaries of digital fashion (Dolce & Gabbana). For projects like yours, it seems you could do the same thing, with just submitting your wearable design through the typical wearable submission process. This is what most brands do. I think the linked wearable option is more appealing because it makes the *distribution* process easier on your end. But I believe there are ways to streamline this process (I apologize, I don't know what they are, but I think Dr. Dripp does). I hope this helps a little. The 4 million vp needed for this is a high number to achieve for any brand, so if your proposal doesn't pass, the regular submission process might be a good idea. Please reach out if you have any questions! Kindly, Canessa

Hi I am open for discussions and understanding why people are voting NO. Please send any questions. We think its of paramount importance for Decentraland and web3 projects to create interoperable NFTs. Thank you Dante

Hi community I am free for any questions we are working on a Wearable that we would love to have the linked version to use directly in Decentraland. I will be at Decentraland's discord as well to answer any questions. We have a really nice community and want to keep working on creating cool assets in Decentraland. Thank you!