Return to Green
Proposal Details
Grant size
Tier
Beneficiary
Description
Web3 technology is often disconnected from in real life applications and the people that could benefit from them. Letting preconceived ideas about why web3 is bad block their ability to utilize these technologies, people that could benefit from them the most do not. One example is artists. Without having somebody to talk with artists about the technology and facilitate them embracing this technology, artists are not able to be benefitted from it. For many artists, creating new NFTs, as well as attracting and maintaining communities that believe in their project is an issue. In Christchurch, New Zealand there is a community of artists (tied to a physical location XCHC) creating a movement in real life through creative events and facilitating spaces in a way that enables community and culture to thrive. However, this community has only started to embrace web3. As a fairly young and small country, the culture has room to improve with their standard of entertainment, nightlife, and creative options in Christchurch and the wider New Zealand. This ultimately leaves many dissatisfied, feeling it lacks the creativity and diversity found in other cities. Without alternatives, the local scene is left with an unhealthy and at times unsafe binge drinking culture, repetitive entertainment, and a socially reserved reputation. Christchurch is especially known for being largely consertive, “closing early”, clique art world, and most “music venues' ' are just bars profiteering off music, leaving most alternative/original music overlooked. Though the XCHC has been doing great work with artists for 7+ years, this community remains a bit hidden from the wider world (as we’re sure most alternative/independant art spaces can relate). Artists here remain disconnected from the global reach and possibilities enabled by embracing web3 technology, such as NFTs, tokens, and DAOs. However, some are ready to take the next step. Once people embrace web3, initially it’s often for personal gain and not for public good. Without utilizing this technology for public good, people are unable to see the huge benefits for the world that can come from web3. By embracing web3 through an artistic community and ensuring that the community is guided by doing public good, we can create a more positive narrative than is currently portrayed in many media outlets.
Voting Power
Return to Green This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 1% 131 VP (17 votes) * No 99% 3,905,907 VP (66 votes)
Seems this grant is to try to get people into web3,no mentions of decentraland. Artist can be onboared in other ways then just paying them to do so,if im reading that correct.
Thank you for taking the time to write this proposal. Since these funds are coming from the Decentraland DAO, can you tell us how they will help Decentraland? I'm a big supporter of the arts, but this doesn't seem like the right way to do it. $240,000 is a LOT of money. Right now there are other proposals trying to secure that much to build directly in Decentraland... I'd love to hear how your proposal will offer a comparable level of growth to Decentraland by building in the real world.
You didn't mention Decentraland once...
it's a nice idea, but i don't think it's related enough to DCL to make sense for the DAO to fund
5 Comments