Wearable Advertising Space Facility & Decentraland Loyalty Points Programme This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 1% 2,227 VP (19 votes) * No 99% 3,650,405 VP (54 votes)

In my personal opinion, I don't think marketplace needs an ads space. There are metrics already in place to show what's trending, latest releases and top sellers at the moment. Voting no for now.

@Canessa since our last proposal we have now minted the name ‘VISIONS’ & we have added a “Team composition and cost estimate”.

I think asking for $73,000 to create an advertising space and rewards program is unrealistic. I would rather see those DAO funds used to promote wearable creators in world, rather than paying an external company to create this. Or if this is something the community expressed interest in wanting, I would rather see the Decentraland Foundation create it. Additionally, the address you are submitting this proposal with is not minted, which is the simplest form of showing an reinvestment into the Decentraland ecosystem. As this is your second time submitting this grant, can you share what you've changed with this one from the first?

Hii, adding my comments here, as I've worked in Advertising full-time and have for the last 15 years in the US w large and small brands, and start ups, and am now transitioning to web3 to get away from the gross abuse of the industry and web2. I personally don't agree with having advertising space ppl can "buy" on the marketplace. I believe if we create a market for ad space usage on the marketplace, it will be the individual creators who will be put aside, as brands and those with money can take advantage. Also, DCL has just implemented more analytics to the marketplace so people can see top sales, who owns the most, etc for example. On top of that, if you go to the marketplace homepage, you see recent lisitngs, recent sales, etc. I'd also say engagement in the marketplace it pretty well engaged when it comes to wearables. Aside from land and name sales, wearables bring in quite a bit for the DAO and it's for creators. But I do think the current system doesn't benefit wearable creators as much as it could, in fact in some ways, it burdens them to think ab how much they need to charge in order to make back the publishing fee, and then profit. This already sets them up in a disadvantage. But I do know if we remove the fee we have now, where will those funds come from for the DAO? This makes me think this could be a larger issue we should all discuss. In addition, a loyalty program for a decentralized social platform, doesn't make sense to me. DCL isn't a business as far as I understand it. And while yes, they may have a brand, the brand stands for a lot of things, a centralized agency or group is not it. I feel as though the way you speak of brands in these contexts is not comparable. This isn't web2. Again I'll reiterate, there is already a newest items list, for both sales and listings on the homepage. Those aggregate in order of posting. Then I look at the tier of the proposal and the amount being asked for, and I do not see how this type of integration and program would cost this much, as there is no clear budget breakdown, of the costs. For all of these reasons above, plus the fact that you refer to its users mostly as sellers, customers, consumers, further adds to my thoughts that you seek to commodify this platform and its people to further a development build for y'alls resume, for this I will vote NO on this proposal.