Skip to content

Infrastructure for LANDs

RejectedGovernance

Proposal Details

Author0x8218…0d59
PublishedMay 21, 2023 12:23
Voting beginsMay 21, 2023 12:23
Voting endsJun 04, 2023 12:23
Snapshot#b802f3c

Description

4 polls were conducted and 3 conclusions were derived. 1. Create a specific category for LAND related matters on the DAO proposal page named "LAND". Refer to Annex (A) 2. All proposals will be decided on a case by case basis, including the permitted tenure as well as whether cost is involved. Refer to Annex (B) and (C) 3. The 'Acceptance Threshold' should be set at 2m Voting Power for 1 parcel, and thereafter, a dynamic threshold is triggered. Refer to Annex (D)

9 Comments

daoJun 04, 2023

Infrastructure for LANDs This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 98% 2,339,165 VP (92 votes) * No 1% 596 VP (2 votes) * Abstain 1% 13 VP (3 votes)

Existential14May 29, 2023

yes i did. cant wait to see the next one

3Point1FourMay 27, 2023

Ahaha if the rental system takes off and becomes sizeable, we'll probably need the LAND manager to supervise. Thanks for the support and I'm glad u enjoyed it! Did u manage to get to the black hole?

Existential14May 27, 2023

Ok. VP restored. A yes from me. And since I don't know how else to tag you @3Point1Four I love the space odyssey build. Pretty cool.

PunkPinkMay 26, 2023

Like @fractilians, I also agree with any proposal that makes things easier for the user.

Existential14May 22, 2023

Can I be a LANDLORD? drop by unexpectedly to check the grounds, make sure rent is paid, not fix things that are broken and pin notices on the door? LOl. I'm just kidding sort of. Ill go with Yes. That is that I would vote YES if not for the fact that I have been stripped of my VP. Until this is resolved then.....

fractiliansMay 22, 2023

This proposal has the potential to help drive growth by improving cost-effectiveness for building in Decentraland. Anything that helps lower the barrier to entry and help attract and engage talented individuals is a big plus for me. It’s also aligned with the DAO's mission to support and empower creators.

3Point1FourMay 21, 2023

This will be the format for the LAND application form: **Form for LAND related matters** Before applying for the use of any space, please ensure that the land you are choosing isn’t already occupied. You can refer to (add in aragon wallet add) to see which LANDs the DAO owns. Do note that roads are not for rent. **LOCATION (if applicable)** [xx], [yy] (similar to POI format) [Option to add more parcels] (max 10 parcels) or ESTATE NAME (max 1) **TITLE** The permission you would like to seek for {Create drag down bar that places 2 options, Permission to rent LAND at [location] and Others} (E.g I want to rent land) **PURPOSE** Give a brief description of what the space is for/ what is the matter you would like to address. (Rent it to build a playing space/gallery) **DO YOU BELONG TO A DAO SQUAD/COMMITTEE** Yes/No options Choosing ‘No’ will disable the option to choose a longer timeframe (up to 180 days max) **AMOUNT OF TIME TO BE OCCUPIED** [Option of 7, 30, 60, 90] days for members, and [180] days option for Squad **TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER DAY DURING OCCUPANCY (IF ANY)** [XXXX] **OTHER INFORMATION** Include details such as if you are currently renting another space from the DAO, or that you are a grantee. **CO-AUTHORS (OPTIONAL)** Options available for members to choose Yes No Abstain

3Point1FourMay 21, 2023

Update: The 6m VP cap for LAND proposals has been removed. This is to prevent abuse of the rent system by rogue entities attempting to rent enmass without a legitimate cause. An allotted time of 7 days is also implemented. Finally, a cap to the the gas fees per transaction is introduced. Quote "**rent payable PER DAY during occupancy (if any)**" under specifications The rationale for adding an option to allow tenants to pay rent sounds odd but if for example, a grantee has been using a certain plot for awhile, is sustainable and wishes to pay to continue using the spot, they are able to do so. Most tenants will not exercise that option, they'll just want to use it for free. It is included so that in future, if there's a need, we don't need to go through the whole governance proposal again just to add an option that allows the tenants to pay rent