[BID-0009] Protocol Squad & Coding Cave This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfb1afa4dc069ffb47b19dbee196045d508fcd5a2) Vesting Contract Addresses: 0x5c6395ed1a969ec614807aa5c4fa9cf7306bda50

[BID-0009] Protocol Squad & Coding Cave This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 89% 8,727,337 VP (53 votes) * No 10% 1,045,869 VP (8 votes) * Abstain 1% 17,655 VP (4 votes)

Hello Sinful, nice to meet you! Unfortunately its not the first time we hear complains about that grant, I recommend you to read my answer to Canessa on the same topic, I leave the link at the end. On the other hand, we are extremely committed to do as good as we can to accomplish what it's required and see this as an opportunity to build our own reputation. Best regards! https://forum.decentraland.org/t/dao-643a962-bid-0009-coding-cave/22257/3?u=gaffomendocinian

voted yes because we need this. taking a risk here considering 2 of the members of this proposal were previously from Metaverse Architects, a group that received a 60k grant from this DAO focused on providing DCL with mental health provisions and services. I have not seen any Mind-Easy provisions or services on Decentraland :( Not to mention Metaverse Architects also self voted on their proposal that would have not passed without their 3.8 million VP.   Link to the Proposal: https://decentraland.org/governance/proposal/?id=af9ca2d0-b808-11ec-903a-6546e8793cef Please no Ruggies :')

This is a great proposal, i think that there is a lot of content already developed on SDK6 and it would be much more expensive to addapt all of that content to SDK7 rather than granting backwards compatibility to the already existing content, as a matter of fact, that was always one of the pillars in which DCL was built.

Same answer of the other bid: AFAIK there are no resources allocated for SDK6 here nor in the Foundation. In this case, the allocation is just `14.400`, and I think it is definitely worth it because of the value that it brings. Future support would not be needed at all because the nature of this adaptation layer is an SDK7 scene! Once it is fully done, the maintenance needed would be only in the SDK7 domain. In my point of view, any scene deployed to Decentraland has to be runtime-support, this doesn't mean if you want to keep developing there's going to be tooling support.

I'm voting No because I think no resources should be spent on the SDK6 adaptation layer. That resources would be much better spent on new clients, improving SDK7, or migrating scenes to SDK7. Supporting SDK6 not only consumes resources now, but also will consume unnecessary resources in the future to keep maintaining the Adaptation Layer.