Should Tobik be confirmed as the winner of the DAO Committee Elections voting? This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0x88013d7ed946dd8292268a6ff69165a97a89a639) Enacted.

:index_pointing_at_the_viewer: qualify? :point_right: :face_with_diagonal_mouth: :point_left: all jokes aside, I personally appreciate your consistency being on this platform. As you know, we don't need the same old same old, so I look forward to seeing a new voice of reason, not another ass-kisser....as you know, numbers don't lie... people do... Happy disrupting @Tobik! #newperspective ?

[quote="TheGoldGuy, post:16, topic:18189, full:true"] @Tobik has staying union status! :laughing: He might not be qualified for the role, but he stayed active the longest when everyone else left. I guess the next question should we create an organized union in DCL? #InternationalBrotherhoodofDCL [/quote] Dude, what are you talking about? I’m qualified, that’s why the committee chose me. You don’t know what you are talking about.

@Tobik has staying union status! :laughing: He might not be qualified for the role, but he stayed active the longest when everyone else left. I guess the next question should we create an organized union in DCL? #InternationalBrotherhoodofDCL

Should Tobik be confirmed as the winner of the DAO Committee Elections voting? This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 97% 10,878,928 VP (252 votes) * No 3% 381,010 VP (17 votes)

@Tobik has made great contributions to DCL, we stand behind him! Please continue to give DCL no less than 100% Tobik!💯

The whales have spoken :whale:

yeah i would really like to see voting done in a way similar to stack overflows mod elections - it's clear and seems like a good way forward. that said, i realize this process takes time to implement, but it would be nice to be clear what it is we are actually aiming for

Nothing personal against Tobik, voting no for the same reasons I described on the past proposals.

**This proposal was submitted by the DAO Facilitation Squad, as part of the ongoing process to select a new DAO Committee Member. Publishing of the proposal is neither an endorsement or indication of support for or opposition to the proposal by its author.**

 The default route is a vote by a ranked choice. The DAO never made a decision or had a vote **NOT** to "implement support for ranked choice voting." What I am saying is an an operator of the DAO, isn't it important to make sure we are following the rules? We never voted to do it this alternative way. We need a ranked vote before moving forward. We have not followed the procedure. I am pushing for an annulment. I like Tobik and if Tobik still has the support, he will win the right way following the correct procedure. I have nothing against him. I think this is a slippery slope if we don't follow the procedures that the DAO enacted. That's my concern.

Can you reframe your question please in a way that has less to do with me. I did not create a policy. I developed a proposal with numerous inputs. I am not trying to override it. I am continuing a process as an operator that has gone through multiple stages and twists and turns. This final proposal is a continuation of that process which has gone through multiple stages, and how and why we are at this stage now has been very well documented.

@Matimio Can I ask you why you created a policy and now are trying to override it with this proposal? Your original policy passed. Why are we going against it?

From an accountability standpoint, no one is following the correct policy. I will remain voting no because the policy for a "Ranked Vote" was not done. There is no reason to override this policy or create a new precedent. We had this procedure in place and no one is following it. Hence why we are having issues with this in the first place. Just re-do the vote as a "Ranked Voting" system and there wont be any questions.

There is no reason for anyone to bother voting on this proposal. The bots and the Whales are on the same page.  At this point, Esteban just wants the process over, and he doesn't believe there are merits to the arguments against the candidate who made it past the first round. Clearly, the three rounds of voting were performative and otherwise pointless.

This elections shows that community lacks voting power and all major decisions are done by a small group of whales. Its not bad and not good, this is reality. DAO is evolving, I believe in Decentraland, please take more activity in working groups related to vp distribution and whale voting. [https://discord.gg/MGSQU2Hs](https://discord.gg/MGSQU2Hs), [https://discord.gg/TMxZJtDS](https://discord.gg/TMxZJtDS)

Since the pre-proposal was previously approved by the community, it indicates that @Tobik was already selected as the winner of the DAO Committee Elections through the voting process. Therefore, it would be reasonable to confirm Tobik as the winner of the elections. 

I am voting yes for @Tobik and I hope he succeeds in his new role!! I did vote NO the first two votes strictly on what I thought was an immaturely level displayed in replies to questions around @RobL obviously illegitimate vote and also replies to/from @jar0d excessive questioning. When I actually dig down to this, I would like to know what his future co-workers think? Do you think you can help him mature into the role? Do you think he can be fair and unbiased when need be?