he busy coding in ice cash poker.

@0xgabe, did this ever get finished?

@Murphjestic sorry for offtop. Could I invite you to discord to discuss our offer of efficient target marketing solutions in the Metaverse? Sorry one`s again for off topic((

Deployable custom NFT shop & dashboard for land owners & operators This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfe91c0c482e09600f2d1dbca10fd705bc6de60bc) Vesting Contract Address: 0x5DB718f777500493593A140eDa8b25d10950E0cE [View Transaction](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3e756a868a43ce7eca363c7796b286cdddc91145ea3bdd005b11db087509ad63)

Deployable custom NFT shop & dashboard for land owners & operators This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 88% 5,766,949 VP (88 votes) * No 12% 817,222 VP (7 votes)

Hello @yemel , Thank you for joining the discussion! Yes, the package will be open source, Everyone can have an instance of the cms for free, no paid service

Is the code going to be open-sourced? Are you providing an instance of the CMS to any users? Is it free or a paid service? I'm not sure if the DAO is funding a public good or just funding your own startup.

Implementation of this proposal would serve to extend the capabilities of Decentraland and benefit its community. Extensibility of the Decentraland platform is one if it's main competitive differentiators, if not THE main one. As such, efforts to extend the platform and improve its usability, deserve strong support.

While this is a little over my head in understanding the current complications, I agree with szjanko. It is great to see things proposed that add value to the community as a whole not just the individual. We can all win together but not without each other. We all need to add value to keep avatars coming in over and over and finding value when they're here

I am sorry you experienced that gabe. Discrimination for any reason has no place here and you are welcomed here. I have not went back to look at it specifically but know that we appreciate you here. I still don't think I can support this proposal simply because I feel like it should cost less to create this and there is no clear breakdown of what each feature will cost. If you did not have community reputation, this would have had much more push back due to its lack of clear funds usage, and may not have passed as easily. I do respect the community members that support you so I will leave it up to them for this one. I do feel like this is a helpful product to have, but the proposal is basically saying devs cost too much, so let's use dao funds to pay 4 devs only, so that nobody has to hire devs to implement this again. Devs need to eat too! lol I will most likely be using the platform even if I think it cost too much so best of luck to ya either way.

i'm sorry, i don't know what you're talking about - maybe you're confusing me with someone else? i didn't delete any comments and if i did you would be able to see that they had been deleted. can you point out the comments that i am "using the same words" from? @mattimus thank you for asking about this in your comment! edit: i went though the lastraum proposal comments and i think you're definitely confusing me with someone else - i agree with everything you said in that thread, assuming you are "gabriel m"

This is an amazing idea and I am all for it .The organization behind the project is reliable and has the proper knowledge all in house to make this possible. With proper funding this can be a reality tomorrow. I truly would love to see this pass and hope all of the community can support this development of this project. With much love and my best of wishes to all. Lets be us Lets be great Lets be Web3!

@mattimus Im refering to the last slice proposal, @dax knows it well, and he even took the time to delete all of his comments. He just commented here too saying that a proper budget for this would be 1 dev for 4 months for a total budget of 15k , which i mean, if he can do it for that money, please make a proposal and do it! I will vote yes on it too and delete this one! I just want the functionality in the plattform, not the money. I changed my DCL username since i was foolish of using my name and lastname as username, and turnes out that on that same proposal this same people were xenophobes about me being from argentina, so i didnt wanted to give any personal details, sorry if this lead to a confusion. This budget covers all of this and the money is 100% oriented towards compensating the devs. The package will be available for anyone to use and re-design as they want

[quote="0xgabe, post:22, topic:15216"] A few days ago there was another grant proposal in which i engaged on a discussion with dax and mattimus questioning a budget of 240k for a proposal. [/quote] What exactly are you referring to here? Your forum account has 4 posts, all of which are on this thread and I do not recall any interactions with you. There are several other questions you chose not to address and there was no attempt at "revenge" or "payback". [quote="mattimus, post:17, topic:15216"] What is the license for the completed project? Will anyone be able to re-purpose individual pieces for their own use? [/quote] [quote="mattimus, post:17, topic:15216"] What are the hosting fees associated with the backend implementation? Does this cover all associated budget for that for eternity? [/quote] Not answering questions about clear budget estimates is dishonoring devs who clearly outline and plan exactly where all of the funds are being spent. I was not attempting to expose anyone's pay but there is a big difference between an hourly rate of 100/hr vs 250/hr. Just because this is helpful to people does not mean you can pocket the extra money. The DAO funds should be used to directly compensate for effort, not attributed to perceived value this provides. Having a clearly outlined estimate of hours and rates is meant for transparency. Dismissing questions, minimizing other's opinions, and providing no further clarification is making this even more suspicious.

Hello @Seanny Thank you for your feedback, im more than happy to answer your questions, im sorry if i didnt previously, but i think that some context needs to be explained. A few days ago there was another grant proposal in which i engaged on a discussion with dax and mattimus questioning a budget of 240k for a proposal. Dax is even using the same words i did on their proposal on a sarcastic way. So given that the comments were only an attempt of payback/revenge for questioning their budgeting, i didnt wanted to lose the focus of the proposal. For example, Whats the difference if the developers charge per hour or per month? Whats the difference if the devs are equal pay or not? Maybe one is be paying more than the other and so what? Now that i explained this, i will like to reply to your message which have 100% valid concerns and questions, The code is interacting with a new smart contract which works differently than the one at awesome repository, we had use that code in the past for amnesia and it was one of the primary motivators to be able to develop a tool for making that management easier. Amnesia people needed to rely on a dev for any updates they wanted to do adding an overhead cost for them for each marketing activation they wanted to do. This new development will also be a ready plug & play solution which can be easily integrated to any existing project in the form of a package and will allow any kind of NFT to be sold in it. So we have to do the web3 interactions, the package, the backend and the CMS, which i estimated 4 months not 6 months. I appreciate the examples that you shared and i will check them out to see if we can re use some of that too :)

[quote="mattimus, post:17, topic:15216"] Without seeing an estimated effort for each task, the budget is too vague for me to vote yes. I agree with dax that this feels a bit high for something that already exists in various pieces and still requires a developer to implement it on scene, even if it simplifies the long term management. [/quote] @0xgabe; whilst I appreciate this grant, and the work you've done in the past; I'm going to have to agree with @dax and @mattimus above. One must keep in mind that a lot of the moving parts mentioned here already exist, and are open-sourced and free to use on the [Awesome Repository](https://github.com/decentraland-scenes/Awesome-Repository). For example, one can already integrate a fully-functional NFT Wearable Shop into their scene, which can allow the owner of the show to display the items they wish to sell on their scene. https://github.com/decentraland-scenes/wearables-store This repo was first published over a year ago. The foundation has more recently updated the code just last month, in the following open-source repository: https://github.com/decentraland-scenes/store-template One may find additional code, related to this project's proposal, here: *Baseline code for an admin panel to impact the simple management of scenes, in-game, with a 2D UI.* https://github.com/decentraland-scenes/crypto-valley-conference-center/blob/master/src/adminVJ.ts *NFT SwapOuts via JSON updates* https://github.com/decentraland-scenes/nft-wall-example-scene The CMS can definitely be helpful to users, but I'm not yet convinced it would require 6 months to develop, especially with the vast experience on the team. Maybe the real challenge identified here is working to actively demystify a lot of SDK-dependent features, however, I feel @dax was quite spot on here: [quote="dax, post:20, topic:15216"] I think it might take 1 dev 3-4 months,12-15k would be a better budget [/quote] I'm skeptical that this is a prudent use of DAO funds, especially given the recent development of the open-sourced code in the Awesome Repository. $60,000 is a lot of money, and without a proper budget breakdown, it is hard to justify the use of these funds, especially when most of the code-side headaches/heavylifting have already been solved, developed, deployed, and open-sourced.

100% this - the idea is good, but imo you're asking way too much. is it going to take 4 devs 4 months to make an NPM package when a lot of the code already exists? I think it might take 1 dev 3-4 months,12-15k would be a better budget

Additionally, it sounds like you already have a large amount of the CMS work completed but would expand it to include the new features which makes me even more skeptical about the budget.

Gabe is a very talented individual. He has been around for a very long time.I am very supportive of the Technology he is creating, this is something we have been needing in the market place for a very long time.We need more creators that can create open sourcing for the community. This is the only way we can grow. Deployable custom Nft shop is the way to go!!!

What is the license for the completed project? Will anyone be able to re-purpose individual pieces for their own use? If individual modules will be available for public use this can be helpful. For example, the avatarshape preview integration as an individual module and the existing web3 integrations w/ external providers are currently lacking. I disagree that this can't be broken down further. How many hours do you expect each feature to take? What is the hourly rate per developer? Your description lists 3 devs and you as the PMO. Are all 4 members receiving equal pay and working equal hours? What are the hosting fees associated with the backend implementation? Does this cover all associated budget for that for eternity? Without seeing an estimated effort for each task, the budget is too vague for me to vote yes. I agree with dax that this feels a bit high for something that already exists in various pieces and still requires a developer to implement it on scene, even if it simplifies the long term management.

I really support this proposal, this team has contributed to Decentral in various ways and I feel that it will be so beneficial. The idea of ​​implementing it in 2D sounds interesting since it would be comfortable to buy or sell from the cell phone while we are traveling ;), besides it would be a good way to make lands useful and add value to them. I support our PMO Gabes and I hopefully it can be implemented.

@alekssupernova thank you very much for your comment! I actually runned a fashion retail company for over 4 years and it was one of the motivators for get this going :slight_smile: When we did the partnership with bershka it would have been a great tool to have!

@Murphjestic @CyrusDaGreat Thank you for the kind words really motivates us to make this an excellent product and we are really excited to get this moving forward

Thank your for your comment, the budget doesn’t have much else to breakdown since the project consist purely on coding and creating a user friendly dashboard that enables anyone to be able to operate an NFT store. The budget is the part time salary of 4 devs for 4 months, so $3750 per dev, per month

Yes! The ability for landowners to easily showcase & sell items within Decentraland has been much needed and is long overdue. Providing the community with an easily deployable tool any landowner can use to monetize their land parcel is a huge gap that needs a solution. This proposed solution will be extremely attractive to current and prospective land owners and operators in Decentraland. I have personal experience working with the members of the team behind the proposal and I can vouch for their expertise and quality of work. Custom tools Decentral Games currently uses across its scenes were designed and implemented by this team, and continue to serve us well. Lets bring DCL to the next level!