Remove the location -115,-26 from the Points of Interest This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfe91c0c482e09600f2d1dbca10fd705bc6de60bc)

Remove the location -115,-26 from the Points of Interest This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 79% 1,412,556 VP (38 votes) * No 21% 378,564 VP (9 votes)

Really good points web3nit... I do feel like we shouldn't be removing POI's without telling the owners first, but if there are no expectations of POI's to begin with, how can we expect owners to adhere to them... so we need to decide as a community what you stated, clear guidelines to move forward with. I'd hate to be an owner and have some life-crisis, only to return to DCL to find that my POI was removed. Thanks for all these good points to consider!

The space was nice once I could find my way in, but it seems "unattended to" if that makes any sense? My vote is yes because I need a warm place when I think of a POI location.

Thank you for sharing! I agree.

For my opinion we can start with: - Finding really "dead" POIs and holding voting to revoke them. For example POIs where there are no community news, abandoned smm pages with no activity at all. - Creating voting code of ethics where we will write all community thoughts including self-voting, voting for money etc. Besides POI, I saw some self-voted governance proposals. - Start research to make new POI system with clear requirements, auto revoking based on some activity KPIs (events, etc), maybe some "activity" warning for owner to revise their DCL strategy and become more responsible. I guess it will be better than just to make voting to revoke POIs because of somethings in the past. Thanks all for your thoughts. Respect for each other and community discussions will give us the key to solution. :handshake:

Thank you @Canessa for pointing this out!

[quote="Canessa, post:5, topic:16094"] I’d like to see POI’s assigned to people who don’t vote on their own POI. [/quote] This is a very good step for the community to start 'enforcing' the ideals we'd like enshrined in our code of ethics. Grants are controversial, as they can get messy. POIs on the other hand are a very good place to start. I would recommend we go through a number of POIs, assess who voted on their own POIs, and reset the playing field. [quote="web3nit, post:6, topic:16094"] Saw some votings where creators vote for their own POI, Dice Masters for example: https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=ec5b1b10-225d-11ed-b4a9-178eb7bc02f5 [/quote] @web3nit this is a really good example. I love Dice Masters, and would happily vote on their POI. Removing POIs that were self-voted will just let us reset the playing field, and 'rebuild' the list of POIs based on the community-approved attitude we're trying to promote. Somewhat of a proactive, productive purge? We need this move *before* we start talking about evolving POIs into Landmarks.

Saw some votings where creators vote for their own POI, Dice Masters for example: [https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=ec5b1b10-225d-11ed-b4a9-178eb7bc02f5](https://) Dont like double standards. :cold_face:

The original POI was passed with 2 very large vp holders as the majority voters on the project, including the person submitting the proposal voting on their own POI star with multiple accounts adding up to 228K vp. I'd like to see POI's assigned to people who don't vote on their own POI. For that I'm going to vote yes, and if it is truly something the community wants to support, they can reapply, just like the Sugar Club had to do. Original proposal: https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=bd9ccfb0-e0f6-11ec-8ad9-ab7454ba5993

Good questions but POI is pretty fresh and they have active twitter. I agree though there are some abandoned POIs but this still doesn't look for me dead yet )) [https://twitter.com/MetapalsClub](https://twitter.com/MetapalsClub)

Are they hosting events for the community? Do people visit this location? Does the owner of this parcel plan to host any events in the near future?

I am not sure its good idea.