'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M18%2080.9996C25.515%2086.6471%2034.875%2089.9996%2045%2089.9996C55.125%2089.9996%2064.485%2086.6471%2072%2080.9996H18Z'%20fill='%23FF2D55'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M9.00008%2071.9996C11.5651%2075.3971%2014.6026%2078.4346%2018.0001%2080.9996H72C75.3975%2078.4346%2078.435%2075.3971%2081%2071.9996H9.00008Z'%20fill='%23FFA25A'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M60.3675%2062.9997H3.75757C5.15257%2066.2172%206.93007%2069.2322%209.00006%2071.9997H60.39V62.9997H60.3675Z'%20fill='%23FFC95B'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M31.8826%2029.2496V62.9996H60.0075L31.8826%2029.2496Z'%20fill='url(%23paint1_linear_1_49380)'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M3.75757%2062.9997H31.8826V29.2497L3.75757%2062.9997Z'%20fill='white'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M60.3675%2047.25V72H81L60.3675%2047.25Z'%20fill='url(%23paint2_linear_1_49380)'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M39.7574%2072H60.3674V47.25L39.7574%2072Z'%20fill='white'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M60.3675%2040.4997C66.5807%2040.4997%2071.6175%2035.4629%2071.6175%2029.2497C71.6175%2023.0365%2066.5807%2017.9997%2060.3675%2017.9997C54.1543%2017.9997%2049.1175%2023.0365%2049.1175%2029.2497C49.1175%2035.4629%2054.1543%2040.4997%2060.3675%2040.4997Z'%20fill='%23FFC95B'/%3e%3cpath%20fill-rule='evenodd'%20clip-rule='evenodd'%20d='M31.8824%2022.4997C34.989%2022.4997%2037.5074%2019.9813%2037.5074%2016.8747C37.5074%2013.7681%2034.989%2011.2497%2031.8824%2011.2497C28.7758%2011.2497%2026.2574%2013.7681%2026.2574%2016.8747C26.2574%2019.9813%2028.7758%2022.4997%2031.8824%2022.4997Z'%20fill='%23FFC95B'/%3e%3cdefs%3e%3clinearGradient%20id='paint0_linear_1_49380'%20x1='45'%20y1='-18.6396'%20x2='-18.6396'%20y2='45'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3e%3cstop%20stop-color='%23FF2D55'/%3e%3cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23FFBC5B'/%3e%3c/linearGradient%3e%3clinearGradient%20id='paint1_linear_1_49380'%20x1='31.8731'%20y1='29.2497'%20x2='31.8731'%20y2='62.9996'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3e%3cstop%20stop-color='%23A524B3'/%3e%3cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23FF2D55'/%3e%3c/linearGradient%3e%3clinearGradient%20id='paint2_linear_1_49380'%20x1='60.3605'%20y1='47.25'%20x2='60.3605'%20y2='72'%20gradientUnits='userSpaceOnUse'%3e%3cstop%20stop-color='%23A524B3'/%3e%3cstop%20offset='1'%20stop-color='%23FF2D55'/%3e%3c/linearGradient%3e%3c/defs%3e%3c/svg%3e){kind=small}
Limit votes to a percentage of the threshold
Proposal Details
Description
Should votes be limited to a percentage of the threshold? For a 500k VP threshold proposal and 100% threshold limit, if I vote with less than 500k, then all my VP is counted in, if I vote with more, my vote is limited to 500k POI/Name ban: - 100% -> 500k VP max per vote - 50% -> 250k VP max per vote - 20% -> 100k VP max per vote Governance proposal: - 100% -> 6M VP max per vote - 50% -> 3M VP max per vote - 20% -> 1.2M VP max per vote
Voting Rationale
0.025
Limit votes to a percentage of the threshold This proposal has been REJECTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xbef99f5f55cf7cdb3a70998c57061b7e1386a9b0)
Limit votes to a percentage of the threshold This proposal is now in status: FINISHED. Voting Results: * 100% 20% 3,959,465 VP (25 votes) * 50% 1% 1 VP (3 votes) * 20% 34% 6,444,466 VP (62 votes) * No limit 45% 8,481,832 VP (68 votes) * Invalid question/options 0% 0 VP (0 votes)
i just want this to pass in some form cause "no limit" is seriously killing the vibe right now.
Makes sense! Happy to move forward with exploring any of the proposed options
It would be useful for grants, POIs and linked wearables. 20% might be too low for governance proposal as it would limit to 1.2M per vote. Better 20% than no limit though =)
I voted for 20%. I think I'm missing something: wouldn't 100% be effectively worthless in the current state? Generally speaking, I'm more interested in the binding governance proposals, and we haven't seen anyone coming in with 6M+ VP. I see the benefit on the grants though, for sure 100% is a good start there, but I'm less concerned about those...
@esteban consider supporting 100% limit :pray:
nice, thanks! friendly whale :cowboy_hat_face:
@Seanny the Good whale :whale: :whale2: :whale: :whale2:
[quote="dax, post:14, topic:18352, full:true"] okay, then @Seanny consider changing to 100% so this poll at least passes [/quote] Done. [quote="Existential14, post:9, topic:18352"] The whales already making sure this doesn’t happen. [/quote] Not all whales.
okay, then @Seanny consider changing to 100% so this poll at least passes
i tried to backdoor a way for people to identify people by making forum names not tied to nfts but registered account that would of made this easier and people just didnt see it haha. We would of been able to eventually identify corrupt people and collaborated votes. End of day without full kyc tho this is fruitless war. I like this tho as a start.
I believe 100% is a nice start. For a POI it would be a limit of 500k and for lower grants it would be a limit of 2M VP, that seems nice.
@HPrivakos @nwiz consider changing to 20% ftw
Hey @HPrivakos what is the difference between this one and the other one? oh nevermind I saw your answer on the other post just now!
The whales already making sure this doesn't happen. How do you propose we get past that? I say it needs to something like voting limits need changed, how do you want to change them 75% 50% 25% and no other choices.
+1 Good idea to limit to percents.
We chatted some in Denver ab this, think its a great idea. Let's hope it doesn't get loop holed!
Will prevent District Leaders from abusing district VP
 Good starting point.
Is there really a point in limiting VP? Whales could just divide their VP between multiple vallets.
Finally, someone proposed it.
22 Comments