Lowering publishing fee will promote innovation in-world as the barrier of entry for creators will be reduced. $100 is fair enough for now. Once we see a surge in creators, we will see a better and affordable wearables suitable for users taste. The risk, however, could be a surge in supply. Once this happen, we can adjust the publishing fee "again" higher. We don't know yet the outcome for lowering the publishing fee so taking this risk is worth pursuing in my opinion. Will vote YES, so my advance apologies if this will not be passed hahaha. This is not ChatGPT-generated by the way. Cheers! Regards Cursed akasya.eth

I have just took the time to view your video presentation where you elaborate on your perspectives. I would like to contribute some insights that I believe are of significant importance but may have been inadvertently omitted. Your analysis predominantly centers around the cost of submission as the solitary variable, which could potentially lead to a misapprehension among the audience. In my assessment, the pivotal factor to consider is the count of Daily Active Users. Notably, your initial point indicates that during the period when the submission cost was lower (below $100), there was a notable increase in wearable creations. This occurrence, however, correlated with a heightened number of active users within the domain. Similarly, the subsequent point in your analysis, highlighting a decline in wearable production, coincides with a decrease in daily active users. Furthermore, it would be prudent to take into account the overall market condition, particularly within the cryptocurrency domain. During periods of market expansion, disposable capital is more abundant, thereby fostering a greater inclination towards exploring diverse entrepreneurial prospects, including the development and trade of wearables. Conversely, this tendency undergoes a reversal during market contractions, as is the current situation. An additional aspect deserving attention is the influence of events such as the MZFW (Metaverse Fashion Week), which has historically triggered a substantial surge in submissions during the encompassing weeks. In my personal opinion, a reduction in the submission fee may not be advisable. I hold the belief that we are poised to witness a substantial surge in all facets of activity within the DCL's economies as we approach and surpass the upcoming BTC halving event in 2024. Until then, it is crucial to recognize that the most impactful determinant of DCL's market dynamics remains the overall health of the cryptocurrency markets themselves.

I don't think $150 is a high price for 100K digital Wearables...You can sell it and make all the profits bru

[(29) DCL Wearable data analysis - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_D8BP3R_-4) @Canessa I have all the data analysis in a video for you <3

@Canessa Hey, Here is all the data of all the past publications, I have converted the timestamps on the sheet to dates [CorrectDates - Google Drive](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQTTD-ePf8-nka_9NyEog4k03T42E1d1KVrU2UmQ6eXI8msRjgKwmslEKxrXFPuxd1YwRU6gkGHrWw-/pubhtml) For the final proposal, if it passes we can even share this doc and make calculations based of this sheet and see if our update on the fees work as expected :D