[Resubmission] Should the legacy POI list be deleted?
Proposal Details
Description
> [This is a resubmission of [this original](https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=b3cb6dc0-9f01-11ec-831d-95af4f79cd2a) proposal that didn't meet the VP Threshold] ### Introduction Points of Interest (or POIs) are a great way for users to explore and learn about cool places inside Decentraland. Right now the Decentraland project is maintaining two lists of POIs: - Decentraland Foundation-maintained list, the first implementation of POIs (Legacy POI List). - DAO-maintained list, updated by the DAO Committee after a governance proposal for adding or removing a POI is approved. ### Problem This **creates an unnecessary complexity** by having to maintain two lists and prevents the DAO community from removing POIs that are defined on the legacy list by using the POI Removal proposal type. On a more philosophical level, having a POI list embedded on the World Explorer (aka. Reference Client) **goes against the principle of decentralization and community ownership of the project** since another client wouldn't be able to use that list. ### Potential Solutions There are a couple of solutions we could implement if we want to unify both lists: - We could simply migrate all POIs from the Legacy POI List to the DAO maintained one. However the legacy list has 90 POIs, and adding all those by an on-chain transaction will have an estimated gas fee of 200 USD each, **totaling a ~$18.000 USD expense to keep those POIs** - We could also delete the Legacy POI List and let the community re-add the POIs that are still relevant (Genesis Plaza for example!) to the DAO-maintained list. To minimize the risk of losing an important POI, before the deletion of the Legacy list we could have a discussion on Discord and the Forum about the relevant POIs that we absolutely need to migrate so we can start creating proposals right after the Legacy list has been deleted. [Legacy POI List](https://config.decentraland.org/explorer.json) - See the [spreadsheet version](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sdjojNKYUOLt-5v2KHnE4-9IFR5zjsUhqckRNVdNX2o/edit#gid=1503583878) with POI names This pre-proposal Poll aims to gather community feedback on the next steps. If any of the YES options get selected, this will become a DRAFT proposal for the community to vote on.
[Resubmission] Should the legacy POI list be deleted? This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfe91c0c482e09600f2d1dbca10fd705bc6de60bc)
[Resubmission] Should the legacy POI list be deleted? This proposal is now in status: FINISHED. Voting Results: * Yes, delete the legacy list and let the community vote for the pois that should be re-added to the dao maintained list 100% 3,146,934 VP (16 votes) * Yes, delete the legacy list and make the dao pay for adding the 90 legacy pois 0% 0 VP (0 votes) * No, maintain both lists 0% 0 VP (0 votes) * Invalid question/options 0% 0 VP (0 votes)
2 Comments