What do you know of the Tulip Bulb Bubble ? This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * It is textbook market history 3% 9,095 VP (5 votes) * First time i hear about it 1% 5 VP (2 votes) * What's this, a pop-quiz ? 0% 0 VP (0 votes) * Invalid question/options 96% 238,388 VP (10 votes)

I made a canny request for non governance polls and was told by Gino or Zino (I can never remember which is which) that it was unneeded. [quote="Ozymandias, post:5, topic:23315"] Because seriously, if you don’t know about the Tulip Bulb bubble, you shouldn’t be voting on important matters regarding the Future Path of Decentraland. [/quote] I can't fathom a good argument for why this isn't absurd. You can't possibly find a rational argument to suggest that the Tulip Bubble is required knowledge to have an informed opinion on all governance issues.

Hello @Ozymandias, although you have recently proposed interesting questions, I think these topics would be more appropriate for the forum or Discord, although I do not deny that their debate could be fruitful for future proposals that improve governance. A poll with only a title and 2 links can hardly make voters understand how this can improve governance.

Based on the results of this Poll, perhaps can be Drafted some kind of motion to require _relevant diplomas_ for being allowed to vote in the Governance stage of the Poll-Draft-Governance flow.

It is absolutely appropriate for a Governance poll. Because seriously, if you don't know about the Tulip Bulb bubble, you shouldn't be voting on important matters regarding the Future Path of Decentraland. You should instead be _delegating your VP to those you trust know better_ ! And you should _purely and simply_ be allowed to re-delegate VP all the same.

I'm not sure if this is appropriate for a Governance poll. Maybe we could request to manage the forum in a different way to separate "governance" posts/polls


tulips have never been capped