New Wearable Rarity Tier: Exotic (50 mint/supply) This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xfb1afa4dc069ffb47b19dbee196045d508fcd5a2)

New Wearable Rarity Tier: Exotic (50 mint/supply) This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 93% 7,949,502 VP (113 votes) * No 6% 517,830 VP (8 votes) * Abstain 1% 16,245 VP (6 votes)

Another reason to not overcomplicate it is because the conversations I've had with the foundation have indicated that the only way to get this kind of change through the pipeline is to keep it simple in scope of work. This already touches quite a few different departments. We learned from Hands category how complicated things can get very quickly. Let's not repeat that. It's already taken a year to get it on their radar, adding a way to set any supply mint + the categorizing by # would be more complex than just adding a new tier and personally I'd rather just have a 50 mint than having it keep being put off to where eventually it just doesn't happen. This happens a lot with feature requests. I used to think that having a custom mint amount would be better, but over the last two years being here I've come to realize that our distinct tiers and rarities is one of the things that sets our ecosystem apart from others. I like knowing exactly what amount of supply something is just by seeing a color or a rarity name. If we added the custom amount I wouldn't know right off the bat how much the supply is. This might not be the best for newcomers either to have to remember a range rather than just a set of tiers. I also do not think that a 2 supply is valued the same as a 7 supply, or 10 supply. Therefore grouping them all in Mythic wouldn't really translate as a "Mythic." It would be a pretty harsh transition for the existing creators and consumers (whether they're present or not during this bear market). This would likely cause significant amount of more UI work to ensure clarity of what's being displayed on the marketplace. Not to mention this would likely cause *a lot* of confusion for collections prior to this change for newcomers. @CheddarQueso @theankou @Bduge

There are many ways to implement and keep both systems and make them fit for everyone. I don't believe that tiers is the only right way. And bduge solution seems perfect and the same as i expected in my mind.

I don't think this is necessary but if the community wants it I'm also not against it. Anyone see a reason why this would be a problem?

It is something the foundation would neglect again so I don’t even bother myself to think to much about it.

THe primary issue is that it is more technically challenging to implement, and this idea works within the existing design

Indeed just give us the option to have any number as the wishes to mint.

You forgot Rare, but otherwise I dig that idea

Why not allow it to be any number and give scopes. 1 is unique any number between 2-10 is mythic any number between 11-100 is legendary any number between 101-1000 is epic any number between 1001-10000 is uncommon any number between 10001-100000 is common And when minting you can just type the amount you want.

Hey there, Nifty isn't the only marketplace that does this and not the first to do so. This idea was discussed heavily and most agreed that it would complicate things too much. It would also nullify every existing tier and would likely result in people not using them anymore.

Maybe it's better to implement amount selection, instead of new rarity tiers? On Nifty, for example, you can select how many pieces you want. Seems more flexible, than tiers