Skip to content

DAO Moderation Handover

PassedPoll

Proposal Details

Author0x5b5c…e244
PublishedJan 29, 2024 15:05
Voting beginsJan 29, 2024 15:05
Voting endsFeb 03, 2024 15:05
Snapshot#0cb0290

Description

The objective of this proposal is to transition the moderation role within these two options: 1) DAO Committee or 2) Moderation team hired through bidding and tendering. The objective is to renew this essential role and open a new chapter based on our frameworks and learnings. As we previously stated, Facilitation Squad will continue to be committed and manage moderation during the grant period, but will also lead and coordinate a process for appointing a new moderation team based on community consultation in the short term. Looking towards to evolve into a more cohesive and active community we believe it’s time to re-think some of the key roles within the DAO while keeping a welcoming and safe environment that brings the best out of all members. In that spirit, we are proposing a new strategy for moderation. Over the past year, many efforts have been done towards this end, being the Code of Ethics our most tangible outcome. The CoE sets the bar for how we want to address our disputes and the minimum level of respect required to jump into any debate. This is not capricious, it’s a statement of core principles that we stand for and that require monitoring and gatekeeping. That’s why we are proposing to open the moderation role and transition this vital position to the most apt and willing in order to renew energies and bring fresh air and ideas. We are confident in saying that we are down the right path and hoping that the feeling of a more tolerant environment is shared. **VOTING OPTIONS** To that end we are proposing two options to accomplish this transition: 1) Creating a Moderation Committee: would include establishing eligibility criteria, framework, compensations and SOW for a 3 people committee elected within a three-staged process: an open call, interviews conducted by the current moderation team, and a final voting using the hiring category. 2) Bidding and Tendering process for a moderation team: would include open bids for an internal or external moderation team and define a SOW and SLA for operating.

12 Comments

NOTjar0dFeb 06, 2024

The process is not "award the lowest bidder" The process is: 1. Identify DAO need 2. Submit outline of needed work 3. Have DAO vote in agreement that work is needed 4. Depending on the nature of the work, others will generally submit what they are willing or capable of doing, and at what price they can do it. 5. Community votes on all options and the one with the most support is selected. So simply placing a bid of $0 is not going to get you the chance to mod. Also, I suspect most people would want to see an offer that appeared sustainable.

InJesterrFeb 06, 2024

@Fehz I believe that this is much wiser thing to do and I said it before, I believe also @MetaRyuk could build up a team for this together with you.

SanninFeb 04, 2024

Yet another committee/squad, yippee 👏

BETFeb 04, 2024

So I need to pay to do work? I'm out lol

HPrivakosFeb 04, 2024

No, this is not an auction to who will be the cheaper.

BETFeb 04, 2024

So if i bid $0 what do I gotta do? :laughing:

daoFeb 04, 2024

DAO Moderation Handover This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0xbef99f5f55cf7cdb3a70998c57061b7e1386a9b0)

HPrivakosFeb 04, 2024

New mod squad, out of the Facilitation squad

BETFeb 03, 2024

What am I bidding on exactly?

daoFeb 03, 2024

DAO Moderation Handover This proposal is now in status: FINISHED. Voting Results: * Moderation committee 1% 4 VP (6 votes) * Bidding and tendering process 99% 5,594,404 VP (46 votes) * Invalid question/options 0% 0 VP (1 votes)

LandlordDaoJan 30, 2024

That sounds good, and it seems reasonable. I'd like to hear more opinions.

HPrivakosJan 29, 2024

I do not think having the current moderation team selecting new members is a good option, too much conflicts of interests. Bid & Tendering, with a simple (not easy, but simple) process to kick moderators if needed (when waiting for the end of the grant is not an option) seems to be the best option IMO.