Skip to content

Should employees of Decentraland be allowed to form partnerships and profit without DAO approval?

RejectedPoll

Proposal Details

Author0x3611…e8ab
PublishedJan 11, 2022 09:05
Voting beginsJan 11, 2022 09:05
Voting endsJan 18, 2022 09:05
Snapshot#TW71kb5

Description

I can't see any governance vote for this partnership with the Australian Open: https://cryptopotato.com/australian-open-joins-the-metaverse-by-partnering-with-decentraland/ https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2022/01/australian-open-nft-metaverse/ https://twitter.com/AOmetaverse However the Australian Open believes they have a formal partnership with Decentraland organised by someone representing themselves as the Head Of Partnerships: https://au.linkedin.com/in/adecata https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1479246753182400517 There are two options here, either Adam is an employee of Decentraland in which case his private company RunItWild is profiting from the NFT project he organised OR he is not and the Australian Open was deceived.

2 Comments

PaulDiracJan 14, 2022

Could you explain what you mean by: > his private company RunItWild is profiting from the NFT project Do you have some more information/insight about what would his private deal be? I voted "Invalid question/options", because it misses the option I would have voted: **"Decentraland Foundation employees can continue bringing cool partnerships like this one, and if they screw up we should fire them"** *edit: replaced "Decentraland" with "Decentraland Foundation"*

daoJan 11, 2022

Should employees of Decentraland be allowed to form partnerships and profit without DAO approval? This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Employees can profit from side hustles 0% 0 VP (1 votes) * Employees must run everything past the dao 27% 189,441 VP (7 votes) * Adam is not an employee, ao was deceived 0% 0 VP (1 votes) * Invalid question/options 73% 511,245 VP (15 votes)