Rather than using your AI to compose and translate your thoughts, you should just use it to understand mine. You just proved my point, and you are delusional. 1 mana 1 vp 1 land 2k vp Always has been, but if someone is gonna introduce vp for creators, better to inlcude the ones whose builinding on land, its simple. Wearables can just be another 3d assets to What ppl build on land. I hope you see it. And stop using "kaibigan" you are not even a real person.

Kaibigan, tigilan mo na ang pagpapahiya sa sarili mo. Noong bumalik ka, umaasa akong nag-mature ka na sa nakalipas na apat na taon, pero hayun—lumalabas na parang bata ka pa rin kung kumilos. Tigilan mo na ang pagpapahiya sa komunidad ng mga Pilipino.

i will care/hope that this kind of proposal to be passed if you will consider builders to it, this is DecentraLAND! not DecentraFASHIONSHOW, if all of you who has tiny brains because they dont exercise it that much and couldnt understand, for their mouth is much faster than their brain, then pitty you!!

Uhhh... ok..? I guess...

Assign Voting Power to Decentraland Content Creators [GOV] This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 34% 757,122 VP (13 votes) * No 65% 1,458,268 VP (6 votes) * Abstain 1% 2,000 VP (1 votes)

the only thing that ppl will keep engaing in decetraland are ART & LOGIC, install that to your brain!

builders will keep building with politics or w/o, tho politics could speedify things, you think creatvies will stop being creative w/o this shit forum??? you must be a joker, 3point1four youre only a talker. dcl dosnt need someone like you, even if you re a biggie investor, you could only be on the side walk. seeing and experiencing things that is being built on the main road! so owning land is to control what would happend to dcl?? that sounds capitalism, this is DECENRALISATION.you just proved my point you just prove my point,, you are stupid!

You just proved my point :rofl:

surem then let those empty lands be empty.

So you see what happens when you introduce an arbitrary VP system(Creator VP) that conjures up VP not backed by any asset. First the creator wants VP for publishing, then the builder wants VP for building, then the players want VP for buying/selling, then the staff wants VP for working. No offence to all 4 groups, just proving a point here. 1 MANA = 1 VP 1 LAND = 2000 VP Simple, black and white. No ambiguity.

If you mean 'creators' that includes builders who build scenes, i vote yes. but if this only for wearable creators alone and how many wearables they create, then no. Its Decentra'land' not Decentr'Avatar'

I agree with this proposal, and should have come to fruition a long time ago. Truth to be told, alot of creators publish wearables mainly for the experience, participate in giveaways, and truly bring a unique dynamic to the platform. Without them? The platform would have a diminished user experience. But this brings this to a larger discussion- we should value assets that are less liquid with higher VP ( Published Wearables, Names, L2 Wearables etc), then highly liquid assets (MANA.) I think it would honestly drive more traffic, and have individuals diversify more in the platform (other then MANA and Land.) Hope to see this pass, and give creators a voice they deserve in governance- as many proposals can barely reach a quorum even with a high turnout.

--- Two things I'd want addressed before this is enacted. 1. ***Who performs the work, and under what authority?*** This assigns implementation to the @DAO-Council and @DCLRegenesisLabs by name: identifying eligible past publications, matching each to a creator wallet, deduplicating payments, building and activating the strategy, publishing allocations, and running a correction process across roughly 10,000 historical records. @MetaRyuk raised precisely this on my governance documents proposal, and the point was well made. The Council is constituted as an oversight body, not an execution arm, and Regenesis Labs' approved scope and 18-month budget don't automatically extend to whatever a passing proposal assigns them. Existing compensation doesn't make new work free — at minimum there's an opportunity cost against commitments already on the books. His vote only resolved once ownership, execution, and final approval were separated and the decision on who performs the work was left with the Council. This one doesn't make that distinction at all. It names both bodies as jointly responsible for the whole thing, including reviewing pending past records, with no scope, no timeline, and no funding source. 2. ***Publish the distribution first.*** The proposal names VP concentration among large publishers as a risk and then doesn't address it. With roughly 2.4 million VP in play, we should see the shape of it before voting: the top 20 recipient wallets by VP, and how many wallets receive under 1,000.

LOL. That's funny. With few exceptions. LOL.

Would be helpful if the DAO leaders could chime in and share their perspectives. @ginoct @yemel @maraoz @toxicwaifu @Monotributista @Zino @MetaRyuk @Canessa @Fehz @esteban

No need to apologize, I understand your opinion. As experience shows things do not always turn out as expected. Nowadays, we can be flexible and adjust our movements according to the circumstances. IMO allocation is **not arbitrary.** Free or rejected publications receive no VP. **Only the paid part counts**, third party paid portions do not count, unverifiable allocations remain pending, and each eligible payment is counted once. Yeah, Creator VP would not be asset-backed in exactly the same way as MANA, LAND, Names, or L1 Wearables. **Instead, it would be fee-based: every allocation would follow a fixed 1:1 rule tied to a verified fee for approved and published content.** At now VP is concentrated among relatively few wallets, and DAO participation is uneven. Broader distribution to verified creators could encourage more publishing, voting, and interest in Governance. Rough estimates suggested that the potential historical allocation could be below 2.5 million VP which isn’t that much. Rule-based VP distribution could encourage greater participation, and give active creators a stronger voice balancing the voting system. **Total governance VP would increase and relative voting weights would change. That is a real trade-off.** We also have active DAO governing bodies and an engaged community. If problems appear, I have no doubt they can be reviewed and necessary adjustments can be made swiftly through the gov process. I have published only one wearable. This proposal is not motivated by my own allocation, but by recognizing creators who contribute to the ecosystem. P.S. This is my personal opinion and I could be off base :cold_face: . **Anyway, Community will decide what is right and what is wrong.**

I can't support the addition of VP arbitrarily if its not backed by assets, as has always been intended. Sorry @web3nit

The "Creator VP strategy" is the technical rule that would calculate Creator VP from verified publication records. It is not a transfer of existing VP. It is a new VP source calculated for the eligible creator wallet. The creator may later delegate it through the normal delegation system.

The proposal uses the actual creator-paid fee recorded for each publication, so it does not depend on the new fee being active. The existing MANA VP rule remains unchanged. Creator VP is an additional VP source for verified fees paid to publish approved content. Each payment is counted once, and sales do not create Creator VP. Yes, this would increase total VP and change relative voting weights. This is intentional: the proposal adds separate VP **to recognize approved creator contributions.**

With the new publishing fee changes that has been approved, I dont think we should implement anything yet until that is confirmed. Im also a little puzzled by this concept. 1 MANA = 1 VP When a creator publishes, he/she surrenders one's MANA to pay for the publishing = Loss of VP When the creator gets a sale, he/she gets MANA for sale = Gain of VP There's a balance to that equation. No inflation of VP whatsoever. Won't introducing this tip that balance?

What is the "Creator VP strategy"? Who is delegating the VP and what pool/wallet would it come from?

**Reference mockup only! Creator VP is not live or officially implemented.** This example shows how Creator VP could appear as a separate source in the Governance dApp and be included in Own and Consolidated VP. The displayed Creator VP is only an illustration based on my published item, not a confirmed allocation. 

Based on the [Decentraland DAO Transparency spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FoV7TdMTVnqVOZoV4bvVdHWkeu4sMH5JEhp8L0Shjlo/), I found approximately **10,642 approved content items with a positive recorded creation fee**: * 9,959 regular Wearables * 79 Smart Wearables * 604 Emotes Their recorded creation fees total approximately **2,430,322 MANA**, which could create around **2.43 million VP** under the **1 MANA = 1 VP** rule. This is only my preliminary estimate from a spreadsheet that may not be complete or current. It does not provide a reliable separate count for Linked Wearables. The final amount may change after checking duplicate records, subsidies, Credits, free publications, creator wallets, and historical payments. Only the DAO Council and DCL Regenesis Labs can confirm the final number using official publishing and payment records.