[quote="nwiz, post:23, topic:15848"] the start and end dates of this proposal differ to the screenshot above [/quote] Date are displayed in local time, so I would guess just different timezone. The proposals are stored on IPFS via Snapshot, not actually by the Governance website, so a migration of the Governance website would not cause the proposal date to change

Just as an additional note, this was a message from a user who text me at the time regarding this proposal. 'Very strange, for some reason this proposal is not loading the results or voting ability for me, nor is it loading my VP from my other accounts.'  Note, the start and end dates of this proposal differ to the screenshot above. Maybe, as a result of the website migration?

 Mmm I tried voting that day and several days after that as well but it never gave me the option to, only the first few votes registered.

Hang on, I am confused here. This is a feature request therefore does not need to go to DAO or at least this is what you said last time. What made you change your mind? Why are you misleading the community with false information? We all know who paused/cancelled this proposal from the beginning. No point after this time trying to blame it on a lame website update issue. Your time is up.

I don't remember the governance website being done for an extended period of time around that date, the website was migrated on Oct 10 but it was only down for a couple hours. We can always restart the vote.

This is true. I've noticed this straight after voting on this proposal. Possibly could have reached 6M yes votes if it wasn't tempered with.

Users were unable to cast a vote on this proposal, through governance.decentraland.org, after a few hours from when I submitted it. It appeared as if it was taken down.

This was a feature request. You said it yourself. Since when the feature request are 6M Governance Proposals?

Governance proposal, which this is, requires 6M VP vote yes, this is why this has been rejected. The draft can be found here: https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=2d4541a0-2858-11ed-ac99-5bece7edccd0

Add the option to upload profile pictures (PFP) to Decentraland Names This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 100% 804,901 VP (30 votes) * No 0% 0 VP (0 votes) I still don't understand how it's rejected when bid majority was towards YES. 1.6M Yes votes to 128K No votes where poll proposals only require 500K votes but somehow this was moved to Governance section? Questions, questions..... 

Once again, there is no proper way for feature requests unless I'm missing something here. From the beginning DAO has been the place to go to for all updates, proposals, even for feature updates. So what has changed now? I have tried your method * Go to https://app.ens.domains/ * Select your subdomain/DCL Name * Go to advanced settings * Set the public resolved * Edit the “Avatar” field with one of the following possible value: [ENSIP-12: Avatar Text Records - ENS Documentation ](https://docs.ens.domains/ens-improvement-proposals/ensip-12-avatar-text-records) And I can honestly say it does not work. Why are you misleading people? How will an average user do all of this? Even if it worked. Also why was this proposal paused or grayed out? Still many questions & no answers. Sad but true.

Add the option to upload profile pictures (PFP) to Decentraland Names This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 100% 804,901 VP (30 votes) * No 0% 0 VP (0 votes)

Well how would the newbies figure that out. We need a solid solution for feature updates.

You can click into the comments and head to the forum, and then scroll down the proposal at the bottom before the comments, you'll find a link to the snapshot page below the DAO page and you can vote there.

The whole point is to make it easy & simple for everyone to be able to upload, social links PFP's etc. How many OG users are currently able to do those steps let alone the new users. Please do inform the team regarding this because I truly believe it's an important feature and the one that will grab the attention of the wider Web3 NFT community.

- Go to https://app.ens.domains/ - Select your subdomain/DCL Name - Go to advanced settings - Set the public resolved - Edit the "Avatar" field with one of the following possible value: https://docs.ens.domains/ens-improvement-proposals/ensip-12-avatar-text-records The DCL marketplace doesn't support that field though, so it won't render the image, Opensea get its image from the Marketplace API so it won't show it either. I will inform the team that there is interest for it, but a proposal doesn't obligate the Foundation to implement a feature. (It's a feature *request* after all)

There is currently no option to suggest/request a feature upgrade - this is the best way to escalate this request further. To your point of necessity - there is no way to customize a Name's background displayed on the Decentraland Marketplace, which makes every "Unique" Name, on first glance, look the same. IMO, this feature is a no brainer and could benefit EVERYONE who owns a Decentraland Name. It appears this proposal can no longer be voted on nor can you view prior votes.

"You can just change the domain resolver yourself on your name/subdomain then add an avatar, I don’t understand the need of this proposal? How do we exactly do this. Through ENSdomains APP or DCL Builder ? Please tell us more.

Thinking for all feature updates, after the initial Dao poll proposal stage which will give us indications as to whether the community is for it or against it, perhaps these don't need to go to stage 2 & stage 3. More simplified way maybe a roadmap addition could be better.

How are all the previous feature updates were pushes before? What is currently in place for these feature updates questions, concerns to be raised and heard by the community, isn't DAO the best place unless I'm missing something here?

@HPrivakos Hey bud, forgive me as I'm a bit hungover from last night BUT I keep hearing about this mysterious feature request option in RE to governance props. Would you kindly advise what the proper pathway to a feature request is so that the community can educate ourselves? I know it might be confusing to some where the line is drawn, and I'm asking you as SAB/DAO/Foundation to guide us. I know that the dao and foundation allegedly have nothing to do with each other but I've also seen/heard you are both.... So whichever personality/identity I need to ask I'm asking that version of you. HP being DAO/SAB and Killian being foundation. Please advise. How do we make an official feature request? I feel like this answer will prevent the community from making governance polls in the future that are really just feature requests. Thanks in advance!

The implementation path seems to be lacking, it just says that ENS have that feature, but nothing more. The implementation pathway need to be a concrete plan on how the DAO Committee can enact this proposal. Proposals cannot be feature request, they are for enacting things on the blockchain. You can just change the domain resolver yourself on your name/subdomain then add an avatar, I don't understand the need of this proposal?

Voted YES, it's a small change that would benefit the community a lot!