Skip to content

Should the VP distribution be revised to add in created items.

PassedPoll

Proposal Details

Author0x57d1…0542
PublishedMay 25, 2026 20:34
Voting beginsMay 25, 2026 20:34
Voting endsMay 30, 2026 20:34
Snapshot#8967c6a

Description

The idea would be that in addition to being issued VP points for some L1 wearables, Lands and names. I think the creators should also get VP for each item they create. When you publish an item you get a certain number of VP. To be fair these are the people active in building a percentage of decentraland. thanks for any comments

Voting Rationale

0x247e…b418Yes, we should get VP for publishing wearables & emotes498,627

https://decentraland.org/governance/proposal/?id=4393e86f-c8c8-4d33-bab6-bb0716fb4d13

0x8218…0D59No, the VP structure is fine as it stands now336,191

Voting No because I feel the current structure is fair. Open to changing my mind if a good argument for otherwise is presented.

12 Comments

PeterParker420Jun 10, 2026

what is the next step I need to do to get this a proposal?

daoJun 05, 2026

Should the VP distribution be revised to add in created items. This proposal has been PASSED by a DAO Committee Member (0x7a7280e299b79b7bd14d7501e3a03a0b77541622)

PeterParker420May 30, 2026

thank everyone who commented and voted. I would like to keep flexing out VP and work on building the world we all want!

daoMay 30, 2026

Should the VP distribution be revised to add in created items. This proposal is now in status: FINISHED. Voting Results: * Yes, we should get vp for publishing wearables & emotes 67% 705,668 VP (8 votes) * No, the vp structure is fine as it stands now 32% 340,867 VP (2 votes) * Invalid question/options 1% 2,000 VP (1 votes)

friskybumblebeeMay 28, 2026

I agree this is needed, creators spend a great deal of time to design, develop, and publish wearables and emotes which really contributes to DCL. They're a huge part of the ecosystem, and it would be of great service to have their voices heard more with additional VP.

PeterParker420May 27, 2026

I agree 100%, Creators spend the most money here and are building everything we all use. I am not a creator but I am trying to learn.

PunkPinkMay 27, 2026

Creators use MANA to upload their products, when they part with that MANA, they lose VP. The logical thing would be to reward them with VP for dedicating time and resources to building on the platform, this would also incentivize creators to be more active.

PeterParker420May 27, 2026

that is def a value! you spent money on fees and heled build this world you should have VP for it....

AaronLeuppMay 27, 2026

This Yes from me. What we seen through history is that the more voting is usually tie to relevant to tax paid thus making tax a little more just even though it is not. No taxation without representation. Decentrland right now is the exact opposite why voting engagement has tanked not gone up since conception and never recovered because there is no incentive to. Yes I am biased because I have spent tens of thousands of dollars on wearable submission fees. Many good things here can happen but this is a great start @PeterParker420

PeterParker420May 26, 2026

you would not be losing any VP for current items owned. the current structure stays and we just add VP for created Items, you dont even need to create an item to get VP for buying a name. Why would pay 100 USD in mana not be a value? its over 1000 mana....but I could spend 1000 mana on names and get 1000 VP, or just hold mana.. keeps things stale

PeterParker420May 26, 2026

My thought is the VP most people have isnt used and those who do use the system should technical have more power. I could see a bunch of users getting VP but not using it. BUt I do understand what you are saying. The ones truly building here should get some. I would say at least 100 VP for a published item, they pay 100 USD and get nothing, but you buy a name for 100 mana and get 100 VP.

3Point1FourMay 26, 2026

Hmm I see the rationale there. But this will mean a structural move away from VP attached to goods owned(land,wearable,names) which has a hard cap, to include services(publishing of wearables and scenes, holding of events?) provided as well. The implications I can see are: 1. It'll reward/encourage people who are already doing it. It may also encourage new people to do so. 2. It may create a moral hazard where people will abuse the system and create low quality services. 3. VP will become inflationary for better or worse. Worth considering both factors i.e the structural move as well as the implications if said moves happen.