3 New Slots Beta (Air Pet, Land Pet, Extra) Implementation This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 86% 5,608,854 VP (42 votes) * No 14% 919,522 VP (10 votes) * Abstain 0% 0 VP (0 votes)

Hi @AaronLeupp I am so glad that you submitted this through Canny. There has been some conversation around this type of request and the three-step governance process and whether that is needed or not. I submitted this poll: [Add search bar to find emotes (decentraland.org)](https://decentraland.org/governance/proposal/?id=0254da03-b74f-488a-85ee-a84ad0d521de) and once it passed, I also put it through [Decentraland Feedback (canny.io)](https://decentraland.canny.io/) and received very quickly an update to the request. I decided not to move forward with the governance process because I realized it should go through Canny because (as I understand) it's a Foundation update and not something the DAO controls. I hope you start to see traction and look forward to wearing my pets :woman_fairy:

Thanks @Fehz for clarification and helping however you can with this process!

Hey there! Just to clarify: I suggested incorporating feature requests, such as the one for Pet Slots, into Canny for further evaluation of their feasibility by the Foundation. Once determined the feasibility, if the request is not prioritized, we can proceed to create a tender proposal. I'd leave this Pitch Proposal as it is, it doesn't harm anyone and it's one step ahead. After assessing the viability of the feature and its implementation (what HP is mentioned), we could take the next steps and present a tender. For every single feature that could potentially be developed by the DAO and added to the platform coordinating with the Foundation is essential.

I just jumped into this conversation because I've never been called a bucket-crab.. This has become the troll thread :troll:

That has always been his strategy, just check his previous proposals, each time we question any thing that doesn't make sense in his proposals he just says "ReReAd ThE PrOpOsAl 🤪🤪"

Oh, this is trolling. Got it. If you aren't a troll, you certainly aren't a diplomat. Being unable to receive feedback or answer simple questions is not a good way to go about getting your ideas implemented. **Setnence 1** [quote="dao, post:1, topic:21751"] Now that the community passed these 3 new slots we have been in talks with foundation to implement them but they may be to busy and saying maybe wont have time the next year or so to do it. [/quote] You then link to a Poll and Draft.... The DCL dao governance goes Poll->Draft->Binding Governance Proposal. is it not reasonable to ask if you have actually passed a governance proposal? **Sentence 2** I Aaron Leupp have offered to work for Free and implement them myself however have been advised by @fehz via DCL DAO discord chat to instead put this through this method bid and tender to allow someone to get compensated for the work. Is it unreasonable to point out that just because Fehz suggested the idea, it doesn't mean that the foundation has to respect it? **Sentence 3** Also this round is just to make the beta slots of Aaron Leupp’s items (Waifumon Gen-2, Decentraland Dinos, “Armory Working Title” BAYC, ApeCoin, MYAC, CryptoPunks, and other Aaron Leupps wearables etc) etc and PunkPink and Old Guys items. This sentence does not appear to address the issues with the foundation implementing the idea **Sentence 4** Later after launch and some time a 2nd round can be developed for these slots to also be open to the public since that as said by the foundation “a bit more complex as we want to have a more complex system” at that point in time before opening these slots to the public for submissions outside of AaronLeupp, PunkPink and Oldguys wearables. **The sentences for target audience and relevant now also don't appear to address the issues raised.** Now please stop being a petulant child. Thanks.

THIS IS THE FINAL RESPONSE TO ALL CONTINUE TO ASK QUESTIONS THAT ARE ADDRESSED IN THE 6 SENTENCE PROPOSAL. :bucket::crab: To you fake puppet account and anyone else that continues to prove they did not read the proposal asking questions that are addressed IN the SIX SENTENCE PROPOSAL will NO LONGER GET A RESPONSE FROM ME. I know you are probably going through lot in your real life to devot so much time to ask so many illerlavant false questions with ill intent, one can only deduce to bring people down to your level It is sad because now the small group we have left has continued tocall you out for this as well and you continue to try to do it to us all knowing we arleady know and one can also deduce it is at this point a cry for help. All I can say is I hope things do get better for you one day and it is ok try evolve. You will be forgiven and met with open arms when you want to instead devote your life to trying to be productive for a chance like you use to be. Thank you. And goodbye for now. Till then.

@Fehz suggesting you do this does not invalidate HP's claim that the foundation won't approve the pull request, so going on to ALL CAPS about reading the 6 sentences seems childish. Anyway, good luck. Would be cool to have more slots.

[quote="dao, post:1, topic:21751"] Now that the community passed these 3 new slots [/quote] Is there a passed governance proposal or just a poll and draft?

> JUST READ THE 6 SENTENCES IT"S WRITTEN IN IT :joy: He doesn't even know what he is asking or what he wants, he has no argument so he just says to re-read the proposal again and again

So you're not gonna do this for free..? And you don't have the ability to implement this..? (a picture drawn in paint 3d does not count) Maybe it would help if YOU actually read people's questions and replied to them accordingly..

lol now YOU proving YOU did NOT read the proposal. You or @HPrivakos or anyone else got an alternative solution we all ears. Till then this is what we were told to do to solve this over 3 year issue so why we doing it. If you always No DCL proposal skim readers got no alternative solutions then keep your false worthless opinions to yourself. 🪣🦀 or tell someone who cares.

Seems like a waste of voters time though if you're actually gonna do this for free.. You got anything public in DCL/GITHUB?

Yes @BET I hope so! Look forward to your vote! 

So your bid price is free...... Looks like you win @AaronLeupp .. Wen dev?

This proposal is stupid.

for the 4th and FINAL time READ THE 6 SENTENCE PROPOSAL THE ANSWERS ARE IN IT. If you have any more questions feel free to ask the person that TOLD ME TO DO THIS METHOD THAT IS ALSO MENTIONED IN THE PROPOSAL. Or continue to push your constant 3+ year bucket crab mentality 🦀🪣 on someone else.

Why put it through bid and tendering if you do it for free :clown_face: And why do you need a proposal at all for this? I'm very curious how you will implement new slots if that doesn't require pushing any code to Foundation repository. Unless you are using absolutely wrong terms and don't actually mean "implement 3 new slots on avatars"

lol no again you did not read the proposal. @HPrivakos if you look over the 6 sentence submission it says in the first sentence and I quote " I Aaron Leupp have offered to work for Free and implement them myself " and " @fehz via DCL DAO discord chat to instead put this through this method " nothing about "pull requests" or "repositories" thank you.

Lol, you didn't understand what I said again. You want new slots, those new slots will require developing to be added to the client, you are asking for money through a bid&tendering to implement this because the Foundation don't have time. Cool. But then the people developing this will have to submit a Pull Request to the repositories of the Foundation, and they will have to approve it, which they won't.

bro lol @OfficialCryptoCube for a second time PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING! This is not a proposal for adding 3 slots. Those already passed. Thank you.

lol @HPrivakos you did not read before commenting again. What you are saying is not the case. Please read before replying again. That aside thanks for all you do.

Not worth paying a grant for this if the Foundation won't approve the Pull Requests.

@AaronLeupp of course I read and understand the proposal. And I'm 100% onboard with a Extra slot. However adding 3 new slots would result in a excessively high amount of new tris. Slowing down loading speed even more. Because of this I feel all pets and any other weird odd ball stuff. That doesn't fit into an existing category. Should all be put into 1 extra slot. If we are going to add this amount of new Tris to the World. I would rather raise the limit of existing slots. Which is something almost all of us have been wanting from day 1 as well. I understand 3 slots already passed. I understand foundation said they were going to implement it but haven't. I understand You want to take on the work yourself for free. And I understand the DAO has suggested you create another proposal so you get compensated as you should. But what I don't understand is how it was so hard to get 1 new slot "handwear" And now we're just going to add 3 more like it's no big deal. I know it's probably the majority who want pets but not everybody does. In my opinion boosting Tri limits across the board. Is a better use of our very limited Tris.