Should DAO implement on-chain voting ?
Proposal Details
Description
Currently DAO uses a Snapshot for all proposals. Snapshot is a off-chain voting tool based on the IPFS decentralized storage system. Snapshot doesn’t use ‘on-chain’ verification. Snapshot sometimes fails to calculate Voting Power. On-chain voting could potentially resolve these issues by moving vp logic calculation on blockchain and making voting available despite third-party failures. Using solutions such as Polygon will help optimize gas fees. There is some software like https://docs.snapshotx.xyz/. This proposal is to understand community opinion on whether the DAO should have an on-chain voting tool to create and store most important DAO governance decisions; not to have a single point of failure in a voting process due to Snapshot lags.
Should DAO implement on-chain voting ? This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 56% 406,199 VP (92 votes) * No 30% 218,385 VP (16 votes) * Invalid question/options 14% 103,225 VP (2 votes)
Oh, didnt knew it. I guess one of the main reasons is fees as HP said. What you think of hybrid model where only gov proposals will go through on-chain voting and dao will cover fees? All this using layer2 tech which will reduce them.
[quote="web3nit, post:18, topic:17332"] voting still goes off-chain [/quote] You can always start an on-chain vote regardless of snapshot. Nobody uses this, though.
voting still goes off-chain through snapshot which lags frequently
Invalid question: The DAO is already on-chain, it's `dcl.eth` on Aragon: https://ipfs.io/ipns/client.aragon.org/#/dcl.eth/
Thx for reply. There is already snapshot x with layer2 starknet tech which reduces fees. There is two more steps ahead(draft,gov) and the goal of this poll to raise this topic/think about ways how to do itin future but not to implement it asap.
No, i havent tried it yet :upside_down_face:
While I do think at some point DCL and DAO should create their own ways to vote and function with sites and not rely on a 3rd party, I think for what's available atm snapshot is the best option. And until the DCL/DAO team can create their own on-chain version w out fees, then we should keep what we have. Voting invalid option, as my choice is not a yes or no but somewhere in between.
IDK. LOL. I gave up trying to find the fine lines. Does Privacy = Transparency?
they never listen to what you say do they man. smfh
Have you tried to change your RPC?
Second day i cant vote on this proposal due to snapshot lags... [https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=a1b85b10-827d-11ed-8fa2-17dd3f32db26](https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=a1b85b10-827d-11ed-8fa2-17dd3f32db26) 
How about snapshot x or any other alternatives? Maybe we can have hybrid system where poll/draft will be off-chain and most important governance decisions on-chain? There are not so many gov proposals.
There is already on-chain voting through Aragon on Ethereum. We moved away from it because of the 30 USD tx fee for each vote.
So "pay" or "pray"? Am I right?
CurveDAO uses Snapshot off chain voting for initial sentiment polls of token holders, and only proposals that successfully pass the polling stage are put up for an on chain vote. [https://resources.curve.fi/governance/snapshot](https://resources.curve.fi/governance/snapshot)
[https://docs.snapshotx.xyz/services/relayer](https://docs.snapshotx.xyz/services/relayer) 
yea bro im not paying 1-6 dollars for every vote if thats case consider it another nail against platform. I wana know the answer to your question and will be waiting before i vote.
What about the gas fees? Hey, @Existential14 is snapshot centralized platform?
If we are to move towards a Decentralized platform then YES it should moved to the blockchain.
20 Comments