Should VP keep assigned to the landowner in a LAND Rental transaction? This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 99% 4,826,042 VP (86 votes) * No 1% 2 VP (2 votes)

"We need a strategy to assign the VP to the renter’s wallet to fix this." That says differently to me. Quoted from the proposal that reads the VP should go to the renter not the actual owner. I think the renter should get the VP but there it should be a long term rental.

My 2 cents: As a land owner that rents.. Not sure why i should lose VP.. Surely I should have some as well for owning the LAND? Half-half seems more fair :man_shrugging: Half for the owner and half for the tenant.. Another problem is.. I "rent" my land to metazone as a safe haven for if i ever lose my keys.. They get all my VP? Someone should check how much rented land metazone has..

@Existential14 this is proposing that if a land does get rented with the new smart contracts, the VP will remain with the owner. You would not be able to rent a parcel and gain the VP.

Its all about timing "The DAO calculates your voting power for each individual proposal at the moment each proposal is created. If your VP changes after this moment, it will not affect your vote on that proposal." Source: https://docs.decentraland.org/player/general/dao/dao-userguide/

So if I wanted some extra VP for a day I could rent a parcel of land for approx $2.50/day and vote on proposals with the newly acquired VP? I'm not against this but i am seeing a way to work the system. Also make sure the VP is transferred back. I think this should only apply to long term rentals of a monthly contract or more at the very least.

Correct Link for the strategy is: https://github.com/snapshot-labs/snapshot-strategies/tree/master/src/strategies/decentraland-rental-lessors