Add coalition to DAO Council This proposal is now in status: REJECTED. Voting Results: * Yes 22% 836,232 VP (8 votes) * No 77% 2,909,623 VP (28 votes) * Abstain 1% 53,929 VP (4 votes)

[quote="web3nit, post:9, topic:23586"] Why don’t you speak out about the VR guys who took more than half a million dollars for Decentraland VR and then disappeared? You didn’t stop them, and they applied for grants multiple times. [/quote] We are talking about the proposals were you voted yes and I voted no, right? https://decentraland.org/governance/proposal/?id=47aac310-c783-11ed-a85e-7ddcee7c678f   

Hey Bro, you’re lying again. Initially, I didn’t want to reply to this comment because conversations with you are often a waste of time. However, your behavior is ridiculous as always. Let me spell it out for you !!! (as I’ve already done before) 1. First of all, I am not surprised that you didn’t know Decentraland DAO had an “Accelerator Category,” which is a private company or revenue-generating initiative seeking investment from the DAO. [https://docs.decentraland.org/player/general/dao/overview/grants-program/](https://docs.decentraland.org/player/general/dao/overview/grants-program/) > Accelerator > > A private company or revenue-generating initiative looking forward to receiving an investment from the DAO. > > Requirements: > > Revenue share with the DAO or alternative value proposition. > > Performance metrics: > > Return of Investment This project idea could have brought significant money to the DAO. Telegram is a great tool nowadays. By the way, I’m still working on it and have found funding elsewhere. 2. Secondly, during and after my work as a Strategic Unit, strategic planning and financial working groups were created (which are still available on the DAO Discord with all their materials). As a result, the DAO began to discuss general and financial strategies. Many great sessions and presentations were conducted as well as some DAO proposals. You can find them here on YouTube: • [Strategic Planning Working Group Sessions](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YI8CvlkoavQ&list=PLEl6fe1igtKDjOhh7sNvW5hvkBYjTmebc) • [Financial Planning Working Group Sessions 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWfvW_8snJw&list=PLEl6fe1igtKCAYS3pHJf_qw5CY3PuifAs) • [Financial Planning Working Group Sessions 2 ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKnmapCSbm8&list=PLEl6fe1igtKCUv8agknrI9K-74QBgI2f5) Also, the Strategic Framework Proposal passed with an overwhelming amount of VP, but you, as a DAO Committee member, refused to fulfill and adhere to it, abusing your power again. Here’s the link to the proposal: [Strategic Framework Proposal](https://decentraland.org/governance/proposal/?id=4f628ce9-ab7f-4aab-abb2-6f10742164e5) 3. **On your FALSE WORDS**: “ This proposal was created 1 hour before the grant freeze, LordLike/coalition knew about it because he was in the DAO Core Unit call the day before where we talked about the exact time we were going to disable grants submissions.” # **This is untrue.Jarod’s proposal to freeze the grants program was supposed to end on Feb 9, 2024, at 03:18. My wife and I submitted our grant on Feb 9, 2024, at 01:37. Screenshots attached.** # **I submitted the grant not because I was in the DAO Core Unit call but because there was a proposal to freeze the grants program, and I guessed it would pass. That’s why I submitted it several hours before. Screenshots attached!!!!!** **This was public information, and everyone knew about it. I’ve explained this to you several times.** # Your comment and false facts once again shatter the myth of you being an honest personality. 4. Last but not least: You harass people who question you and your actions in the DAO. You’ve been with Decentraland, working for the Foundation and as a DAO Committee member, for five years. Yet, here we are with a centralized council model and a client that is far from being in the best condition compared to its competitors. Where are your results? Your whale friend abused grants with VP, as several respected members have pointed out, but you’ve said nothing about it. Instead, you protect him. Why don’t you speak out about the VR guys who took more than half a million dollars for Decentraland VR and then disappeared? You didn’t stop them, and they applied for grants multiple times. This is what I call double standards.These are just a few examples. All you do is say “NO” and abuse power. Last time, you violated DAO governance rules, specifically the Code of Conduct, by unbanning a DAO member at your own discretion before the due date. Many people are too scared to call you out directly. Privately in dms, even your friends admit I’ve done far more for DAO than you..... LOOOOOL. It’s sad that after so much time, you’re still lost. I believe someday you will grow up and be more kind to people. Good luck and take care!  

[quote="Darynkon, post:6, topic:23586, full:true"] Thanks to coalition, the DAO started focusing on Strategy and Financial well-being. He is a candidate who isn’t afraid to speak the truth about what’s happening in Decentraland. Not all of his decisions were perfect, but he accomplished many positive things for the DAO. [/quote] This is coalition/lordlike partner, not an unbiased feedback. He got a 32k grant that didn't bring any meaningful results and abused of internal informations while he was part of the "Core Unit" to try to get a 127,200 USD grant for something totally unrelated to Decentraland with his partner Darynkon. He can in no way be considered a serious candidate and should not be in charge of anything after what he did in the past.   (This proposal was created 1 hour before the grant freeze, LordLike/coalition knew about it because he was in the DAO Core Unit call the day before where we talked about the exact time we were going to disable grants submissions)

Please, the DAO was way better before his chatGPT proposals.

Thanks to coalition, the DAO started focusing on Strategy and Financial well-being. He is a candidate who isn’t afraid to speak the truth about what’s happening in Decentraland. Not all of his decisions were perfect, but he accomplished many positive things for the DAO.

It's LordLike aka web3init

Hi @coalition! I don't know who you are but several of your posts have been insulting. I greatly admire the courage for honesty but insults are rewarding to those who are insulting others and don't have much constructive value for who they are towards. I hope my honesty is constructive for you because we don't have time to play anymore. There are going to be 5 people in this council and we need a streamlined path to a successful future. This will take debate without infighting and a willingness to grow individually as a person, as well as a group.

**Application continues here...** 6. [Financial Planning working group sessions 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWfvW_8snJw&list=PLEl6fe1igtKCAYS3pHJf_qw5CY3PuifAs) 7. [Financial Planning working group sessions 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKnmapCSbm8&list=PLEl6fe1igtKCUv8agknrI9K-74QBgI2f5) You can look more at my activities in my DAO profile: https://decentraland.org/governance/profile/?address=0x247e0896706bb09245549e476257a0a1129db418 I am eager to collaborate with the community to shape the future of Decentraland and DAO and ensure its continued growth and success.

I have had mixed conversations and interactions with @web3nit I appreciate that our recent conversations been positive, but I will vote NO based on your performance in the last paid DAO position. It is nothing personal only performance based. Take care, Jenn