Should VP keep assigned to the landowner in a LAND Rental transaction?
Proposal Details
Description
This proposal promotes to the next governance stage the outcome decided by the community on the previously published poll regarding Voting Power assignation in the new LAND Rental protocol being built by the Decentraland Foundation.
Voting Power
Should VP keep assigned to the landowner in a LAND Rental transaction? This proposal has been ENACTED by a DAO Committee Member (0xbef99f5f55cf7cdb3a70998c57061b7e1386a9b0)
Should VP keep assigned to the landowner in a LAND Rental transaction? This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 98% 8,005,933 VP (89 votes) * No 2% 232,846 VP (2 votes)
I thought we already voted on this. Yes.. keep with the land owner. Grassyass. :smiley:
Looks like I missed that one, unfortunately. I would have voted for the VP to transfer to the tenant renting the land, rather than the landowner keeping it. Therefor, voting no on this proposal.
Hey @Doug-NFTWorld to give you more context, this Governance proposal is the promotion of this original poll where this question was asked (and decided by the community): https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=b21c30c0-5af6-11ed-8d3a-4fd4826afe14
@Nacho Is it possible to build the subgraph is such a way that the VP can be given to the tenant instead of the landlord for the duration of the lease? The way I see it, VP is assigned to LAND, not users, and should follow the LAND. Once ownership of LAND is transferred to the tenant, the VP should be transferred to the tenant as well for the duration of the lease. If it isnt possible to give the VP to the tenant for the duration of the lease, I agree that letting the landlord keep it is the next best option so that the VP doesnt stop circulating during that time.
6 Comments