Skip to content

Extend the DAO Committee from 3 to 5 members

PassedDraft

Proposal Details

Author0xffac…24c0
PublishedJan 03, 2023 13:31
Voting beginsJan 03, 2023 13:31
Voting endsJan 10, 2023 13:31
Snapshot#812ebcf

Description

The DAO Committee is a group of 3 semi-trusted individuals who have been selected by the community to hold keys in a multi-signature wallet and other mechanisms to enact decisions on the DAO. This group is responsible for enacting any passed votes with a binding action, like funding a Grant, banning a name, adding or removing a POI, implementing a Governance proposal or adding a Catalyst node. Adding a member to the Committee strictly increases the security of the DAO given that there are so few members.

Voting Power

00.5M1MRequired to pass01/0301/0501/0701/0801/10
YesNo

Voting Rationale

0xE1eE…6D64Yes604

Having a total of 5 members will increase security and ensure actions can be taken in a timely manner.

5 Comments

jar0dAug 23, 2023

When are we going to do elections for #4 and #5?

daoJan 10, 2023

Extend the DAO Committee from 3 to 5 members This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 88% 6,527,019 VP (205 votes) * No 12% 910,253 VP (12 votes)

TheGoldGuyJan 06, 2023

Extend the DAO committee and give a pay cut for the positions held.

HPrivakosJan 04, 2023

I agree that we need more members on Aragon, but extending the DAO Committee will also make multisig (daily) operations more complicated to coordinates. Reducing the trust in individual safe keeping millions is a terrible idea IMO. We could remove them if someone goes wrong, but in the meantime they could still send thousands of transactions (on both aragon and multisig), hoping one would pass or in the case of Gnosis (which require no transaction and a single person to start a tx and 2/3 or 4/5 in the future), blocking the operation until those thousands of txs get rejected by all other members.

mazafakaJan 03, 2023

More members and lowering their salary will be a good option :)