Should the DAO implement a mechanism to delegate VP to multiple wallets? This proposal is now in status: PASSED. Voting Results: * Yes 59% 5,742,553 VP (300 votes) * No 41% 4,002,674 VP (11 votes)

Thanks for the thought out dissenting opinion. It's appreciated and will be considered as this prop moves to the binding governance proposal stage.

I disagree with allowing people to delegate their Voting power at all. If someone has VP and chooses not to use it to vote that is IMO fine. However, to provide an ability to make it super easy to allow many others to use their VP I believe is problematic in the following ways: 1. Those with the ability to vote but for whatever reason chooses not to get involved in governance shouldn’t, IMO, be permitted to simply offload their civic responsibility onto others; but as I mentioned this just my personal opinion. Similar to a many other elections including political elections, if a person decides they are not interested in voting, or are simply too lazy to vote, they aren’t permitted to reallocate their vote to others. 2. Creating a super easy and cheap mechanism to delegate to unlimited persons will likely lead to a grey market allowing those with a lot of VP to essentially “rent” their VP to the highest bidders. 3. It will make it quite easy for those that intend to submit a grant or any other proposal, but lack the requisite VP themselves, to essentially “rent” all the VP they’ll need to approve the grant or proposal themselves (or at very least vastly improve their odds of getting it approved) from many different people, and possibly across multiple wallets, thus disguising the deceptive nature of this behavior, at what could ultimately be very low or no cost. 4. While I would like to see many more people participate in voting, multi-wallet delegation of VP, IMO is not the answer, as this could and should be accomplished by buying DCL assets that provide associated VP. 5. IMO multi-wallet delegation is simply a means of giving away decision making power to, in many cases those with little or no skin in the game, and in many other cases, provide an easy way for those with self-serving interests to easily and cheaply game the system to unjustly enrich themselves. For these reasons I voted ‘no’ on this proposal

Thanks everyone who's voted. @RobL (or whoever manages District X's VP these days) any feedback on why you voted no? Your voting history shows you approved the first version of this proposal.

Easy yeeeeees, support!

It seems like an excellent proposal to expand the voting system in DCL. Agreed.

Agreed. This seems a reasonable and logical expansion. It would be nice to have some kind of transparency as well regarding delegation of voting power. I also love the idea of what you are doing. Put the voting power in the hands of the people on the ground